°Ç¸ç³Ô¹Ï

Skip to main content
Consultation outcome

Summary of Responses: consultation on the proposal to implement a ban on the use of BPA and its analogues in food contact materials

Applies to England and Wales

This consultation has concluded

Detail of outcome

Detail of feedback received


Original consultation

Summary

This consultation sought stakeholder views on the proposed implementation of a ban on the use of BPA and its analogues in food contact materials

This consultation ran from
to

Consultation description

Introduction

Overview

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) conducted a 12-weekÌýÌýÌýacross England and Wales that concluded in December 2025.

Food Standards Scotland (FSS) undertook a parallel consultation process within Scotland at the same time. The main objective of these consultations was to collect both evidence and feedback from stakeholders, thereby supporting regulatory decision-making.

Objectives

The consultation process focused on several key areas:

  • to collate further evidence as available on the health risks associated withÌýBPAÌýand related substances inÌýFCMs
  • to examine the practical considerations involved in implementing such a ban, including technical and economic factors
  • to encourage stakeholders to comment on any potential exemptions to the ban, ensuring that regulatory measures would be both effective and feasible

Key areas for stakeholder input

The consultation specifically sought stakeholder input on several key areas relating to the proposed ban onÌýBPAÌýand its analogues inÌýFCMs. Respondents were invited to provide:

  • new or emerging scientific evidence regarding the health risks ofÌýBPAÌýinÌýFCMs that might challenge the current scientific consensus
  • information on the toxicity or health risks ofÌýBPAÌýanalogues, particularly how these compare toÌýBPAÌýitself
  • examples of specific uses ofÌýBPAÌýor other bisphenols inÌýFCMs where a ban would cause significant or unavoidable difficulties
  • details of industry-led studies or trials, either conducted by respondents or known to them, which demonstrate the feasibility or challenges of replacingÌýBPAÌýand related substances
  • views on anticipated obstacles to implementing a ban onÌýBPAÌýand its analogues
  • feedback on aligning transitional periods and derogations with those of the European Union
  • identification of any possible unintended consequences that could result from the proposed ban
  • any additional comments or evidence considered relevant to the proposed ban and its implementation

The intention behind these focus areas was to collect a thorough and balanced range of insights (scientific, operational, and regulatory) from diverse stakeholders. This was to ensure the consultation fully considered both the health risks and the real-world implications of regulatingÌýBPAÌýand its analogues inÌýFCMs.

This report offers a concise overview of the feedback, including details about respondents and emphasising common themes and issues. The Annexes contain both a summary of responses and specific comments to open-ended questions.

TheÌýFSAÌýwishes to thank all contributors for their valued input.

Overview of respondent demographics

Feedback was gathered from a diverse group of stakeholders, reflecting the breadth of interest and impact associated with the proposed changes toÌýBPAÌýregulations inÌýFCMs.

Respondents includedÌýFBOs, manufacturers, trade associations, local authorities, consumers, and several anonymous contributors.

In total, 62 responses were received during the consultation period. The majority of these submissions were made through the online survey platform, accounting for 49 responses. An additional 13 responses were submitted via email. Where email feedback directly addressed questions posed in the online survey, these responses were integrated with the survey submissions to provide a thorough and unified analysis.

Individual consumers were well represented among respondents, with 24 participating through the online survey and a further 2 contributing via email.

Industry stakeholders (organisations, companies and associations) made significant contributions, with 25 responses provided through the online survey and 11 responses sent by email. These also included an organisation sending detailed argumentation and references to support their online response.

This combination of consumer and industry perspectives meant the consultation captured a comprehensive range of views and experiences relevant to the proposed regulatory changes.

Documents

Updates to this page

Published 4 March 2026

Sign up for emails or print this page