RAM 2027: overview
Updated 2 July 2026
This guidance gives an overview of the recyclability assessment methodology (RAM) 2027,includingwho must use it,how it ɴǰand the policy principles supporting it.
Largeproducersshould read this guidance alongside theRAM 2027 materials assessmentguidance to assess recyclability for the 2027 reporting year (1 January to 31 December 2027).
Largeproducersshould use RAMDz1.1to assess recyclability for the 2026 reporting year (1 January to 31 December 2026).
Who must report recyclability data
Underextended producer responsibility (EPR) for packaginglargeproducersare legally required to use the RAM toassess the recyclability ofthehouseholdpackaging they supply.
They must report RAM assessment data alongside their other packaging datato the environmental regulators.
Largeproducers can checkthepackagingdatatheymust reportunder EPR ڴǰ貹첹Բ.
Packaging that’s affected
RAM assessments must be carried out on:
-
household packaging, including household drinks containers made from glass
-
packaging that commonly ends up in publicbins
RAMassessmentsonly need tobe carried out onreusableand refillable household packaging the first timeit’ssupplied.
Principles that support RAM 2027
The RAM 2027 provides a way to assessifpackaging can berecycledthrough all stagesofthe recycling[footnote 1] process usingexisting operational recycling infrastructure.
Collecting packaging isonly onepartof therecyclingprocess;packaging must also be sorted effectively, reprocessed into usable recyclate, and applied in ways that keep resources circulating within the economy (referred to as ‘recycled at scale’).
RAM 2027 builds on RAM version 1.1 by:
-
maintaining the methodology’s focus on what happens in practice
-
considering established technologies andreal‑worldoperational performance
-
considering if the system has sufficient capacity to manage the volumes placed on the market
How the RAM ɴǰ
Producers mustassess packaging as eitherawholeitem of packaging formed ofintegrated componentsor as separate components and check it meets the definition of the materialcategorythey’rereporting under.This stepisknown asclassification andwasreferred to asthe firstof 5 stagesinpreviousversions of theRAM.
DZǷɾԲھپDz,RAM2027evaluates itemsof packagingand componentsunder8material categoriesat4 essential stagesof recyclability:
-
DZپDz
-
ǰٲپDz
-
dzԲ
-
پDz
To claim that packaging is “recycled at scale,” producers mustensure they haveevidence that:
-
packaging is moving through these stagesin practice through existing, proven infrastructure (not pilot or experimental systems)
-
the system has sufficient capacity to manage the amount of this packaging being supplied to the market
At each stage,packaging must be assessedas either red, amber orgreen with final assessment ratings reported alongside other EPR for packaging data.
RAMratingsaffect thewaste disposal fees producers must payfor that packaging material. Red-rated materials will incur higher chargescompared tomore recyclable materials. This is called ‘fee modulation’.
Find out how waste disposal fees are calculated.
RAM ratings arenot related tootherrecyclability labellingthat may be on the packaging.
Stages of recyclability
Before packaging is assessedat each stage of the 4 stages of recyclability,producersmustassess:
-
if theirpackagingis considereda whole packagingitem formed ofintegratedcomponents orasa separatecomponent
-
the material category they must report under
This is referred to as classification.
Stage 1: Collection
Collectionconsiderswhether andhow packaging is captured through the UK’sestablishedoperational recycling system. It refers to the main route by which a packaging item enters the recycling process and must reflect systems that work at scale inreal‑worldconditions.
RAM collection data for each reporting year reflects what is collected at the time of RAM ܲپDz. packaging that is commonly collected for 2027 andpreviousreporting years.
Commonly collected at kerbside
For a green rating at collection assessment stage, the item of packaging orcomponentmust be collected at kerbside byatleast75% of local authorities across the UK.
Limited collection at kerbside
Some items of packaging and components are collected by a substantial number oflocal authoritiesacross the UK but fall short of meeting theat least75% threshold for commonly collected at kerbside.Itemscancontinue to be assessedatfurtherrecycling stageswith a capped amber ratingifthey arecollected at kerbside by at least 50% of local authorities across the UK(limited collection).
Packagingthatis not listed ascommonly collected or limited DZپDzmustbe rated redunless itmeets take-back scheme evidencerequirements.
Stage 2: Sortation
This refers to the process of capturing and diverting packaging waste intoappropriate wastestreams for further reprocessing. In somelocal authorities, this separation occurs more extensively at the kerbside by consumers (for example, source separated versus comingled collection systems).
For the purposes of the RAM, the focus is on the ability of packagingwasteto be sorted at scale within UK operational material recovery facilities (MRFs), and whethersufficientsorting capacity exists to handle the volumesupplied.
While packaging items may technically be sortable into relevant waste streams,various factorscan hinder their effective separation in sortation facilities such as:
-
ܾ賾ԳٲپDzԲ
-
DzԳٲԲپDz
-
packaging design
-
throughput pressures
Assessments must be based on the state in which the item of packaging and components can reasonable be expected to end up in the recycling system.
Future iterations of the RAM may seektoleveragesampling datafrommaterial recovery facilitiesto provide a moreaccurateassessment of the sortation capabilities and efficiencies in practice in the UKfor each packaging material and format.
Stage 3: Reprocessing
Reprocessingis the stage wheresorted packaging wastecan beturned into usable recyclate. This step is a crucial part of the RAM, assessing whether a material can be recycled through technologies that exist and operate at commercial scale.
Each material type requires specific reprocessing technologies and conditions. Even when a material reaches areprocessor, its successful conversion depends on:
-
the capabilities of the installed infrastructure
-
whether there issufficientcapacity to handle the volumesupplied
Different reprocessing systems have different limits on what they can tolerate.
Common issues include:
-
contaminating materials
-
-
ܱپ
-
incompatible polymers
If contamination is too high, the process becomes less efficient, quality drops, or the material may be rejected entirely.
For a packaging format to be consideredreprocessableat scale, it must:
-
be compatible with existing, proven reprocessing technologies currently in operation
-
be able to run through these systems without causing disruption or requiring anypre‑treatment
-
meet the quality thresholds needed to produce a usablerecyclatethat can return to the value chain
-
havesufficientreal-world reprocessing capacity available to absorb the quantity of the packaging being supplied to the market
Therefore, the criteria set out in the materials specific section reflect these attributes.
Future updates to the RAM may look to incorporate direct data from UK reprocessors, such as:
-
yield rates
-
contamination impacts
-
real-world throughput
This data will helpto provide a clearer picture of how each material performs in UK operational systems and whether scaled reprocessing capacity exists.
Stage 4: Application
Application refers to how therecyclateproduced after dzԲisultimately used,and whetheranyfactors limit its ability toreturn to the value chain.
Recyclatequalityis important. Poor qualityrecyclatemay only be suitable for limited orlow‑valueuses or may needfurthertreatment before it can be used, which can increase material losses.
For a packaging format to be considered recyclable at scale, itsrecyclatemust have an establishedend‑use. This means the recycled material should be able to:
-
enter production streams in a way that reduces the need for virginmaterials
-
support circular material flows
-
maintain product quality and safety
The RAM aims to incentivise the production of high-qualityrecyclate.
Future versions of the RAM will aim to integrate better UK data onrecyclatequality, practical end‑markets, and the extent of secondary material losses. This will help ensure that materials assessed as recyclable at scale truly contribute to a functioning circular economy.
Take-back schemes
Dedicated take-back schemes offer a way to recapture materials and packaging types that are not collected at kerbside(commonly collected orlimited collection).
Packaging can be reported as amber if producers have evidence that it is collected using a take-back scheme and successfully recycled.
Producers who can meet take-back schemeevidencerequirementsdo not need to follow the RAM materials assessment guidance.
Packagingthatis listed as commonly collected or limited DZپDzdoes not qualify for take-back and must be assessed using the RAM material-specific guidance.
Producers must notify PackUK that packaging is being reported as amber based on a take-back scheme. Guidance on how to notify PackUK will be shared in due course.
Plastic (flexibles) may be collected from kerbside. In this case producers will be able to continue to use take-back schemes alongside kerbside collection for the 2027 reporting year.
Evidence requirements
Producers must keep clear, specific evidence that the chosen take-back scheme meets all the following criteria:
-
it has accessible collection points (in-store or at household waste recycling centres) that at least 75% of the UK population or households can access within a 5-mile radius of their home, or offers a postal take-back service that covers at least 75% of UK home addresses
-
it does not compete with kerbside collections (the materials are notlisted as commonly collected or limited DZپDzat kerbside)
-
it accepts packaging from all brands
-
itdoes not require consumers to make a purchase before depositing an item
-
can show traceability of the specific material (such as polypropylene) through the 4 stages of recycling– collection, sortation,dzԲand پDz
Producers should ask take-back scheme operators to provide them with the required evidence.
Take-back schemes may accept multiple packaging formats and material types but are notrequiredto. For example, a take-back scheme designed for toothpaste tubes is notrequiredto accept glue tubes (even if the format is similar) but isrequiredto accept toothpaste tubes from all brands.
If a scheme accepts multiple product types (such as glue tubes and toothpaste tubes), it must have evidence that each product type is sorted effectively prior to reprocessing to prevent contamination. If a scheme accepts multiple material types, it must have traceability evidence for each specific material through the 4 stages of recycling.
Examples of evidence
Evidence of accessibility may include:
-
take-back collection points plotted on a map overlayed by a gridded population density map
-
a link to relevant content on the take-back scheme’s website explaining how the public can sign up to or access the service, if appropriate
Evidence todemonstratethere are no brand orpurchasingrestrictions may include:
-
a written declaration from the take-back scheme operator
-
a link to relevant content on their website
-
photos of signage at the drop-off point
-
other means of communication
Evidence of traceability needs to include details about:
-
thepackaging recovery note (PRN)orpackaging export recycling note (PERN)from accredited service providers who sort and reprocess the waste material - such as references to waste transfer notes and other documentary evidence showing that material has been reprocessed
-
service providers who will be handling disposal for any collected material that is too contaminated to reprocess
RAM recyclability ratings
As a result of the recyclability assessment, packaging willbe givenone of3RAM پԲ:
-
red -packaging has specifications that make it difficult to recycle at scale, it cannot reliably move through the existing recycling systemdue to challenges in collection, sortation, reprocessing, or because noend‑useexists within current operational infrastructure
-
amber-packaging may experience challenges during collection and difficulties in sortation, requires specialist infrastructure for reprocessing, theefficiency and output quality of reprocessing is affected, or there is some secondary material loss
-
green-packagingis widely recyclable in the current UK infrastructure
Automatic reds
Some packaging will be rated red automatically. Theautomatic red criteriaisbased on:
-
established UK regulations
-
recognised risk frameɴǰ
-
evidence on impacts to recycling systems and material recovery
Packaging that’s considered automatic redcannot be considered recyclable within EPR, regardless ofitstechnical recyclability, becauseto do so wouldcreatelegal, chemical, orsystem‑levelbarriers to safe and effective recycling.
Future direction of automatic reds
PackUKmayconsideraddingadditionalcriteriaforautomatic red rating in future iterations of the RAM.Thesemay include:
-
packaging material that does notincludeanyverified recycled content
-
excessive packaging based on empty space, unnecessaryfillersand similar inefficiencies
Decisions onmaterialratings and future RAM ٱپDzԲ
PackUKis responsible fordesigning, maintainingand publishing the RAM, and for making the final decisions on materialratingcriteria.
PackUKis supported bythe RAM Technical Advisory Committee (TAC).
The TAC isanindependentadvisory bodythatadvisesPackUKon packaging sustainability and the annual review of the RAM.
ճ TAC includesrepresentativesfroma broadcross-section of the packaging value chain. It supportsPackUK to assess any planned changes tothe RAM, making sure those changes reflect recyclability and consider different bases of assessment.
PackUKwillalso becollaboratingwith the appointed PRO and industry stakeholders to refine and update the criteria set out in the RAM.
³ t RAM will be published
The RAM will be updatedeach year and published before the next reporting year starts. Each annual update will be evidence led.
Future iterations will build on existing evidence and data toensure the RAMcriteria isaligned tohow packaging materials perform in practice within UK operational infrastructure.
Green claims
Producersshould consider RAM ratings alongside relevant Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) guidance, including the, when making packaging decisions.
-
Defined in ↩