KAM Guide: IP and wider knowledge assets in technology transfer
Updated 6 August 2026
پ
This guidedoes not constitutelegal, business, financial or other professional advice and should not be relied upon when taking business, legal or other decisions. The IPO is not responsible for the use that might be made of this information. Appropriate professional advice should besought.
Every effort is made to ensure that the information provided isaccurateand up to date as at the time of publication. However, no legal responsibility is accepted for any errors or omissions.
This guide may link or signpost to external sites. The IPO is not responsible for this content including the accuracy or reliability. It is your responsibility to ensure the accuracy of any guidance and other information you must exercise your own judgment when engaging with this content or associated services.
ԳٰǻܳپDz
Purpose of this guide
This chapter provides guidance for universities and research institutions carrying out research, knowledgeexchangeand technology transfer. It draws on good practice from across the sector.
It sets outsomestrategic themes relating to intellectual property (IP)and wider knowledge assets,to support activities linked to the commercialisation of research.
The guidance explains how toidentify, manage and use IPand wider knowledge assets. Ithighlightsimportant considerations for protection,collaborationand commercialisation.
It is intended for people involved in research,innovationand project delivery.How it is used will depend on your role,responsibilitiesand organisational context.
The guidance includes prompts and examples to help you recogniseIP and wider knowledge assets, bring together relevant information, and consider options when planning projects. Examples are illustrative and do not cover every situation. Further sources of support are signposted where relevant, and key terms are explained in the glossary.
Technology transfer,IPand wider knowledge assets,andresearch
Academic staff are likely to be involved in a wide variety of researchand commercialisationactivities, such as:
-
DZǰپDzԲ
-
ٳܻԳٲ
-
industrial 貹ٲԱ
-
DzԲܱٲԳ
-
ԲԲ
-
spin-out company formation
-
start-up company formation
In this guide, technology transfer refers to the process of moving knowledge, research, inventions, innovations from one entity to another.Forexamplefrom university to business, or between universities.
ղ1:This tableprovidesillustrative examples of knowledge exchange and commercialisation activities that can generate income within the higher education sector. These examples reflect categories captured through national data collection on university engagement with business and the wider community, which records activity annually across the sector. The full range of activity is captured through the annual (HESA) survey.
Note: This table is an illustrative synthesis to signpost common activity types and is not intended to reproduce the HE‑BCI framework,definitionsor coverage in full.Forsector‑levelreference, the authoritative source is the annual HESA HE Business and Community Interaction (HE‑BCI) survey and its published tables and definitions.
These examples are:
-
research collaboration
-
research 貹ٲԱ
-
funding and investment
-
licensing in
-
licensing out
-
company creation
-
spinning out
-
starting up
-
social enterprise
-
sustainability activity
-
diversification of income
-
for-profit enterprise
-
knowledge transfer 貹ٲԱ
-
DzԲܱٲԳ
-
continuing professional development (CPD)
-
contract research
-
small research facilities
-
managing access to large-scale equipment
-
specialist centres
-
advisory activity
-
regulatory activity
-
ٳܰ
-
貹ٲԱ
-
accelerators
IP due diligenceand freedom tooperateassessmentsplayan important rolein supporting technology transfer. By helping toidentifyexisting IP, clarify ownership and understand any third‑party rights, it builds a clear picture of the IP landscape surrounding a project. This improves confidence for all parties involved, supports constructive negotiation of agreements, and reduces uncertainty around howknowledge assetscan be shared,licensedor developed.
A clear project scope helps toidentifyIPand widerknowledge assetrisks,opportunities,contingency planning. It will help to:
-
plan resource allocation
-
identifyareas of concern
-
assess gaps in skills, infrastructure, and funding
Active recording and curation of this kind of information at the beginning of a research project helps toidentifyand manageIPand widerknowledge assets.Keeping the plan updated throughout a project means any changes to the underlying assumptions can beidentifiedto mitigate risks or take advantage of any new opportunities.
Research can take many formsandmay make use ofdifferentsourcesof funding.Eachfunding may havea specific set of terms and conditions that need to beidentified,understood and managedwithin the project and institutional context.
Universitiesand research activities vary in opportunity,purposeand context.As a result,there is no single mechanism or pathway for how universities undertake research, engage in knowledge exchange, or commercialise knowledge assets.
However, your institutional IP policyis a document thathelps tooutline your institution’s approach to the management ofIPand widerknowledge assets. The IP policyfurtherprovides guidance on institutional procedures and governance systems to be followed.Italsosets outdesignated authority for decision making and sign offandwho to ask for help.Further guidance on creating an IP policy in your institution is in theIPpolicy chapterof this guide.
The NPSAtosupport evaluation of new research proposals and considerations before collaborating or partnering.
Universities and research institutions are often registeredcharitiesandthis guide highlights charity law compliance as a consideration in the institutional context. In England and Wales, theprovides the statutory framework referenced in this section.The Charity Commission publishes guidance. Theystatethatthisis to help you set up and run your charitybyproviding relevant background when considering how charitable status interacts with activities and partnerships. For example,how charities reconcile contract research and partnerships with businesses with their charitable status.
The IPguides,published by the , on Research byHigherEducationInstitutionsprovides comprehensive overviews on specific fields of IP rights and IP management, including practical tips and further resources
UKResearch andInnovationpublish,presenting examples of the people and projects it invests in and the impacts.
Technologytransfer
For the purposes of this guide, technology transfer is described as the movement of IP or knowledge assets between entities. This can occurthrough mechanisms such as partnerships, collaboration, licensing,assignmentsandspinoutcompany formation.
The technology transfer process is governed by institutional policies such as those concerned with IP,and by associated legal frameworks.The guide thereforeemphasises the importance of understanding institutional policies, processes and procedures that support these activities.Highlighting thatearly engagement with relevant professional services as part of good practice in research activities that may involve knowledge assets or IP.
Technology transfer can occur between universities, businesses, or government.Therefore, technology transfer activities will differ depending on the asset, the mechanism of transfer and the nature of the outcome.
For a widely used international framing,as a collaborative process. This processenables scientific findings,knowledgeandIPto flow from creators (such as universities and research institutions) to public and private users, supporting transformation into products and services.
IdentifyingyourIPand widerknowledge assets
It is important to understandtheIP and wider knowledge assetsyou haveincluding third party IP,and under what terms and conditions you can use them.The complexity of the research environmentmeans thattheremay bemultiple opportunities for IP conflict. This couldincludesituations where relevantIP and widerknowledge assets may be unavailable for yourintendeduse.
It is helpful to developan initialunderstanding of your activities and any potential impact on those activities. This supports active and consistent decision making concerning your IP and wider knowledge assets. The following sections set out some options.
Check IP and wider knowledge assets ownership and access early.
Before starting any project or venture (whetherfundamentalresearch or commercial work),identifyany relevant IP and wider knowledge assets (such as data, materials, software, orknow-how). Confirm who owns them and ensure you have theappropriate rightsor permissions to access and use them.
Identify,understandand actively manage your opportunitiesfor IP and wider knowledge assets.
Build in time toidentify,understandand manage potential opportunitiesconcerning IP and wider knowledge assetsas your work develops.
Plan how you will protect IPand wider knowledge assetsbefore you act.
Considerwhat protection isappropriatehowtoprotect your IPand wider knowledge assets. Put a planin place before publishing,sharingor progressing activity, so youmaintainyour ability to usetheIPand wider knowledge assetsyou may need.
Use confidentiality measures where needed.
Consider whether youmayneed a Non-DisclosureAgreement (NDA)or ConfidentialityDisclosure Agreement(CDA). These agreementsprotect your ideasand any sensitive information generated or owned,recordingthe conditions for disclosure and sharing.
Understand contractual terms and obligations.
Before entering into any contract or agreement, make sure you understand the terms,conditionsand obligations. Forexamplehow confidentiality, responsibilities, and IP/knowledge assethandling are set out.
Engage specialist support early.
Ask yourtechnologytransferofficeorrelevantprofessional servicesteamearly in the processforadvice and support across these considerations.
Using an invention disclosure form
A confidential invention disclosure form provides aconfidentialrecord ofa new inventionor innovation opportunity. It captures how the invention was created, its key features, and any factors that may affectprotectionand usesuch as IP rights.
The invention disclosure form is a confidential record tailored to the organisation’s IP policy and governance processes.
It is important that everyone involved in research understands the need todisclosenew inventions confidentially, how the process works, and its limitations.
University guidance on internal and external disclosure timing, and the risks of public disclosure, isusually availablewithin an organisation.Thismay form part of theorganisation’s IP policy.
Completing the formappropriatelywith the university’s professional services team is important. It supports clear documentation, helps assess protection, use,management,opportunityand risk.It helps toreduce the risk of premature disclosureandhelps clarify inventorship and ownership.
The formmaytypicallyincludethe following examples.
Confirmationof who the inventors are and the nature of their contributions, to support clarity and avoid later disputes.
Detailedtechnical information about the invention, including:
-
the technical problem it solves
-
a comprehensive description of how it works
-
anypreviousinventions it builds on
The datethe invention was conceived.
Detailsof any past or planned public disclosures, such as:
-
conference presentations
-
publications
-
discussions with third parties
Any prior public disclosure may affect the potential patentability of the invention.
Detailsofthird partycollaborators and funders, including their IP positions and any related obligations.
Theuse of third‑partymaterials, artificial intelligence tools, software, code,dataor other contributing elements.
Understanding IPownership,IPduediligenceandopportunity.
IP ownership refers to the legal rights over assets such as patents, copyright,trade marks, designs and trade secrets.
Understanding ownership is an important part of IP due diligence. This includes knowing who owns IP, what rights exist, and whether there are any constraints on how knowledge assets can be used or commercialised.
Academic freedom to teach and publish sits alongside the need to understandhowto use or exploit knowledge assets. This includes doing sowithout infringingthird‑partyIP or breaching duties of confidence.
Publishing can be used to place ideasor innovationin the public domain. However, timing is importantas publishing too early mayprevent later patent or design protection of your creations.
Before starting research projects, collaborations, partnerships, licensing, or commercialisation activities, IP due diligence activitiesmaybe undertaken.
This processcan help toidentifysuch things as:
-
further opportunities
-
connected contracts and research
-
funders T&Cs
-
third-party IP
-
potential liabilities
-
security or reputational risks
-
any legal or regulatory requirements, such as export controls or obligations under the National Security and Investment Act
For commercialisation opportunities specifically,IPdue diligence should confirm who contributed to the IP and widerknowledge assets.It should also confirmwhether the institution has the rights needed to take the opportunity forward.Some high-levelconsiderationscan beused to guide due diligence.A few examples include:
-
contributors (including staff,collaboratorsand students)
-
funding sources and associated terms
-
use of external materials, software, data or other resources, and any licences or restrictions
Theobjectiveis to ensure clarity on ownership,rightsand permissions before progressing.
Publicationand IP
Before any form of publication, it is important to consider how IP and widerknowledge assetswill be managed.Many IP rights require protection in a specific sequence and cannot be recovered once prematurelydisclosed. For patentable inventions in particular, publication,conference presentation, or otherpublicdisclosuremust not occur before filingthe patent.Prior disclosure removes novelty and prevents a patent from being granted.Therefore,it iscrucial to involve your university’sprofessional services earlywhereyourresearch may lead to a patentable invention, or any form ofknowledge asset.Correctly handled confidential disclosure to your universities professional servicesteamwill not negativelyimpactyour invention.
Within universities, significant new knowledge is generated and often published openly.Itisthereforeuseful to consider funder terms,openaccessrequirements, publisherrightsand any rightsretention policies.
Publication may also occur through institutional repositories, including student theses.When preparing a thesis for submission or deposit.Italsohelpsto consider any IP and widerknowledge assetsitcontainsand todeterminewhat measures may be needed to safeguard them. This includes ensuring that material requiring protection has not been prematurelydisclosed.Any necessary steps for managing confidential or potentially protectable contentshould betaken before the thesis becomes publicly available.
Funding conditions can also shape publication routes.For example, some funders require notification or acknowledgement.Sponsors mayalsorequest temporary delays to the release of theses or outputs until IP protection is secured.
Transfer ofmaterialsintoandout ofinstitutions
Transferring materials owned by a university to another university, institution or business is a routine part of research activity. These transfersare normally set out in a material transfer agreement or similar contract.This will includeany associated rights in the materials, including IP rights and widerknowledge assets.
Having an agreement in place before materials are sent to or received from another organisation helps ensure that expectationsare clearly described and applied.These expectations can bearound use, publication,ownershipand confidentiality.
Such agreements should reflect the principles of the institutional IP policy and are typically managed through professional services.
Recordkeeping
Maintainingaccurate, up-to-date records is an important part of managing and protectingIP and wider knowledge assetscreated within an institution. Clear documentation helpsestablishownership or authorship when needed and captures the terms and conditions governing access,useand control of the assets. Consistentrecordkeeping, aligned with institutional IP management processessupports tracking anddemonstratingimpact.It alsoprovides informationrequiredfor reporting to funders, including charities with specific compliance expectations.
Students andٳܻԳٲ
Significant numbers of students are creating businesses during or after their studies.In 2024/25, this as new businesses started by recent students with formal support fromtheirHE provider, reporting 4,687 suchstart‑ups.
Understandinghow IP and widerknowledge assetsare generated,ownedand managed in this contextis therefore increasingly useful.Students may be undergraduate or postgraduate.Universitiesmaysupport these activities indifferent ways, includingthroughinvestmentandprovidingworkspaces,resources,mentoringand businessnetwork access.
Institutional IP policiesshouldset out the position onownership ofstudentgenerated IPandavailable support.They should also coverany circumstances in which the university may take equity in student ventures.However, ownership can differ depending on factors such as funding arrangements, the use of existing university IP or the level of collaboration with university staff. Sponsored projects, studentships and collaborative agreements mayestablishdifferent ownership positions. Undergraduateand postgraduate students mayalsobe treated differently depending on the nature of their work.
When students contribute to research, their role and any associated IP rights should be clearly understood and explained. Institutions may also need to consider whether agreements,such as IP assignments, confidentiality agreements or internship and visitor arrangements,arerequired.
It is important to distinguish between inventors and contributors. Inventorsare thosewhoactually devisedtheinvention. This means thatthat they contributed to the formulation of the inventive conceptand thereforemeetthe legal definition of inventor.Other contributors mayhavesupportedresearch and beennamed on publications,buttheydo not meet the legal definition of inventorship.
Across all scenarios,accuraterecordkeeping and clear contractual arrangements help ensure that IP ownership, responsibilities and related obligations are understood.It also ensures these aremanaged in line with institutional IP policy and processes.
Teaching andlearning
Demand for university courses changes over time, and universities often adjust provision in response to employer and student needs. Teaching is also increasingly supported by digital tools and online delivery. When designing and delivering courses, it is helpful to consider howIPand wider knowledge assets are created,usedand shared.This coversownership andpermitteduse of teaching materials. Thisalsoincludes recorded and digital learning, where institutional policies may set rules for creating, accessing, distributing,reusingandrepurposing recordings. Institutional IP and copyright policies canhelpclarify who owns course materials and what happens whenthe creatorleavesor movesorganisation.Areview of UKuniversitycopyright policies found most address teaching materials explicitly.Itis also important to addresstermination rightsand manage thewhole process.
collaboration
Research collaboration brings together different forms ofexpertise, experience and resources, and it often involves the creation, exchange and use of IP and widerknowledge assets. Collaborations can provide access to specialised equipment, facilities and skills, and new forms of partnership can broaden perspectives and strengthensupply‑chainresilience.Theseactivitiesfrequentlygenerateshared outputs.It isthereforehelpful to ensure that the management, protection and use of the resulting IP andknowledge assetsisclearly understood by all parties.
At the outset of any collaboration, documenting who owns existing IP and widerknowledge assets, helps toestablishclarityand reduces the likelihood of future disputes. Thisisalso helped by agreeing ownership of any new assets generated through joint activity. Clear arrangements support effective collaboration and enable partners to work confidently with shared knowledge and resources.
An appropriate agreement,such as a collaboration contract or bilateral arrangement,should set out how IP and widerknowledge assetswill be accessed,usedand protected. This includes defining rights to background assets contributed by each partyandrights to new assets created during the project.It also includesany conditions related to confidentiality, publication, development, ongoinguseor commercial use. Partners may seek rights to exploit project results commercially. Therefore,the agreement should make clear how such rights interact with institutional aims and how potential conflicts of interest will be managed.
Institutional IP policies provide the overarching framework for knowledgeexchange and commercialisation activity, including collaboration, licensing,partneringandspinoutroutes. They explain the institution’s approach to IP ownership, use and the sharing of financial returns, aligned with its charitable purpose and governance processes.This is detailed in theIP Policy chapterof this guidance.
Governance
Governance foundations
IP and wider knowledge asset governance refers to the framework of policies,processesand regulations.Theseguide how an organisation manages,protectsand uses its IP and wider knowledge assets. This framework is intended to support ethical,legaland strategic handling of IP and wider knowledge assets, aligned to wider business or research goals.
Governance processes should also ensure that decisions and activities are reviewed and authorised by individuals with theappropriate authority. There should be a clear governance process and timeline for approvals within stages of technology transfer and commercialisation activities.
Collaborating institutions shouldmaintainup-to-date IP policies aligned with organisational goals, and proactively manage their IP portfolios, associated rights and any relevant agreements.
International knowledge exchange and collaboration
International partnerships can offer access to diverseexpertise, approaches and resources, including specialist facilities and equipment that support research atdifferent stages. However, international partnerships can also introduce new risks.
International knowledge exchange and collaboration increasingly involve the creation, use and movement of IP and wider knowledge assets across borders. Many of the principles that govern domestic collaboration also apply internationally, but working with overseas partners introducesadditionalconsiderations.
Before entering an international partnership, it is helpful to consider the legal and IP protection frameworks in the relevant jurisdictions. An IP due diligence process can help to clarify the nature of the project and the role of each partner. It can also identify the legal environment in which collaboration will take place.
Differences in national IP laws, such as rules on assignment, inventorship, registration, time limits or translation requirements, can affect how assets are protected and used.
When collaborating internationally, it is helpful to ensure that institutional policies and procedures specifically guide how IP and wider knowledge assets will be managed across borders. The UKoperatesa strong IP system, but partners overseas may be subject to different legal frameworks, ownershiprulesand terminology.
Consideration of national security requirements may also be needed, particularly where technology areas involve dual-use applications or sensitive research.
International collaboration can also engage other regulatory frameworks. Export control rules, data protection requirements and technology transfer regulations may apply, depending on the subject matter and countries involved. Research involving personal data may require cross-border data sharing agreements thatcomply withlaws such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
International collaboration can expose IP and wider knowledge assets to additional risks. These may include infringement, misappropriation of IP, mismanagement due to lack of knowledge, and cultural and legal differences. They may also include compliance obligations, language barriers in contracts and agreements, and challenges in transferring IP or data across borders. Understanding these risks helps institutions manage their assets responsibly when working internationally.
Agreements should therefore set out how background IP is contributed and how new IP will be protected, used,ownedor commercialised. Agreements should also cover how knowledge assets and confidential information will be shared and protected throughout the collaboration.
Contracts and agreements used in international collaborations should be translated accurately and tailored to thejurisdictionin which the work takes place. Clear choices around governing law,jurisdictionand contract language help to reduce the risk of misinterpretation where IP ownership and inventorship laws differ. Agreements are usually governed by the laws of the country where the research occurs. However, they may instead be governed by the legal framework of the country of the commissioning or collaborating partner if this is agreed between the parties.
Clear,accuraterecords and active contract management support transparency and help safeguard both existing and newly created knowledge assets. Depending on the circumstances, institutions may also need to seek specialist legal input to ensure that agreements and IP arrangements are robust and aligned with institutional policies.
The European Commission Cross Border decision guide is. It takes the user through a decision-making process and raises a set of strategic questions to consider when planning and negotiating collaborative research projects.The appendices to the decision guideand IPR rules in 19 European countries and New Zealand.
IPand wider knowledge assetgovernance refers to the framework of policies,processesand regulations. These guide how an organisation manages, protects and uses its IP and wider knowledge assets. This framework is intended to support ethical, legal and strategic handling of IP and wider knowledge assets, aligned to wider business or research goals. Governance processes should also ensure that decisions and activities are reviewed and authorised by individuals with the appropriate authority. There should be a clear governance process and timeline for approvals within stages of technology transfer and commercialisation activities.
National Security
National Security and Investment Act (NS&I Act)
The National Security and Investment (NS&I) Act was introduced in 2021 and gives the UK government powers to protect national security. The government can scrutinise and intervene in acquisitions made by anyone, including businesses and investors and in business transactions. In instances where an acquisition could harm the UK’s national security, the government can impose certain conditions on an acquisition or block it completely. Further information, guidance and case studies are available on the National Security and Investment Act.
The requirements of the Act extend to Higher Education Institutions. Thegovernment has published separateguidance for the higher education and research intensive sectorson theNational Security and Investment Act.This coversitsimpact on research and commercialisation activities.
The Investment Security Unit sits withintheCabinet Office andoperatesthe National Security and Investment regime. You can contact the Investment Security Unit for an informal discussion about notifications or a future acquisitionby emailinginvestment.screening@cabinetoffice.gov.uk.
National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) -Trusted Research & Secure Innovation
NPSA is the National Technical Authority for personnel and physical security and offers protective security advice to a range of organisations across the UK. TheTrusted campaign is aimed at the UK’s higher education and researchsector.Itoffers practical advice and guidance to raise awareness of potential risks, help support secure international collaboration, and drive improvements in research security practices across the sector. The guidance has been developed in collaborationwith the sector to ensure it is practical and proportionate.
websitecontainsextensive information for academics, professional services/research services, and senior leaders in UK universities and research organisations.It alsooffers a range of tools to help support individuals and institutions conduct research securely.
NPSA have also developed guidance and materials for the emerging tech sector.Thecampaign offers practical and proportionate steps for small businesses, start-ups andspin-outsto protect their innovation from the start of their commercialjourney.Itincludes accessible “Quick Start”guides as well as more detailed security information.
Research Collaboration Advice Team (RCAT)
The Research Collaboration Advice Team (RCAT) provides guidance to research institutionsregardingthe security risks linked to national and international research.It alsoassistsin the protection of the security of the UK’s research ecosystem. RCAT is the first point of contact andatrusted source for advice onidentifyingand mitigating risks to international research collaborations.
RCATisresponsible for:
-
increasing understanding among academics of the laws and regulations they need to follow as they work internationally
-
developing academics’ understanding about unacceptable tactics we see adversaries using-how these put researchers and their work at risk, and how these risks can be effectively and proportionately managed
-
improving the government’s understanding of how academicsencounterrisk and how they tackle itand how government and academia might work together to improve practices
-
supporting academic institutions to design
-
implementingpolicies and standards which reflect the importance of the UK’s research base to national security
RCAT is not an enforcement body. They work with research institutions on a voluntary basis, with full respect for the independence of academics and their institutions.
Within research institutions, communication with RCAT should be conducted through your institution’s nominated RCAT point of contact. If you are unsure who this is, please contact yourresearchoffice.
RCAT have regional representation throughout the UK, covering:
-
Edinburgh (Scotland and N Ireland)
-
Salford (RCAT Head Office and N England)
-
Birmingham (Midlands)
-
London (SE England – 2 teams)
-
Cardiff (S Wales and SW England)
Moreinformationis availableontheResearch Collaboration Advice Teamand their role to provide adviceon the national security risks linked to international research.
UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)
(UKRI) is the national funding agency investing in science and research in the UK to advance knowledge, improve lives and drive growth. Operating across the whole of the UK, UKRI brings together seven Research Councils, Innovate UK, and Research England.
International collaboration is vital. It ensures that the extraordinary potential of research and innovation can enrich and improve the lives of people in the UK and around the world. UKRI helps the UK’s research and innovation system to thrive by supporting UK researchers and businesses working with people, organisations, and facilities around the world.
UKRI has offices in China, India, North America, and Europe which are co-located with British Embassies and High Commissions. These offices are building and broadening UKRI’s research and innovation partnerships within those regions. Further information is available inUKRI’sand.
operatesa Trusted Research and Innovation Programme to protect theIP, sensitive research, people, and infrastructure that it supports from potential theft, misuse, and exploitation.UKRIhas published ‘Trusted Research and Innovation: principles andexpectations’.Thisoutlinesthe principles that UKRI applies to Trusted Research and Innovation and its general expectations of thesupportedresearch organisations.These organisations include businesses, research institutes, and research technical organisations.Its expectations are also set out in UKRI’s policy on organisation eligibility, and in the terms and conditions for specific awards, including anyadditionalterms and conditions.
Academic Technology Approval Scheme (ATAS)
The is a certificate issued by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO). It gives the applicant the required security clearance to study specific subject areas.Guidance is available on the Academic Technology Approval Scheme..
Commercialisation
Commercialisation is the process through which academic, scientific and technical research outputs are translated into products, services or technologies that reach the marketplace. It enables universities and research institutions to maximise the value and impact of theirknowledge assetsby applying them beyond academia and contributing to social and economic benefit.
IPand widerknowledge assetscan be commercialised indifferent ways, includingsuch things as:
-
DzԲܱٲԳ
-
ԲԲ
-
joint ventures
-
貹ٲԱ
-
the creation of spinout companies
Institutional IP policies set out the principles that govern these routes and provide the framework for managing translational activity.
To support commercialisation, IP and relatedknowledge assetsneed to beidentified, evaluated and protected ina timelyand coordinated manner. This relies on active IP management, ensuring due diligence can be completed efficiently and that freedom tooperateis understood andmaintained.
IP duediligence is commonly undertaken by professional services teams andshould bealigned with institutional policies in areas such as IP, risk,employmentand finance.Additionalconsiderations may arise depending on the nature of the project or activity.
Areas whereIPdue diligence typically supports commercialisationcaninclude:
-
awareness of academic entrepreneurship and the IP arising from it
-
identification of new opportunities andassessmentof commercial potential
-
protection and management of IP and widerknowledge assets
-
support for translational development
-
reviewingof funding terms and conditions
-
licensing of IP and the formation ofspin‑outcompanies
Across all commercialisation pathways, clear processes and well‑maintainedrecords help ensure that IP andwiderknowledge assetsare managed consistently with institutional policies and long‑term strategic aims.
Technology Readiness Levels
Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) describe the maturity of a technology, from early research through testing and demonstration towards use in practice. TRLs are used to summarise technical maturity, including how far a technology has progressed through evidence,testingand demonstration.
Some sectors and organisations use terms such as “commercial readiness levels” to describe how close an innovation is to being taken up or deployed. These terms are not defined in a single, standard way and can vary by sector.Commercial factors can be considered alongside TRLs to support a rounded view of what may still be needed to move towards use.This avoids the need fora separate commercial readiness scale.
TRLs were originally developed by NASA and are now used widely beyond their original context, including in UK government material and research funding guidance.
Source: TRL scale descriptions and definitions are published by NASA and are used widely in other contexts, including UK government material and UKRI funding guidance on activities and eligibility across TRLs.
Table2: Summary of Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs), showing levels 1 to 9 and their descriptions from early research to operationaluse.
TRL 1–3: fundamental research to proof of concept:
-
TRL 1:basic principles areobservedand reported
-
TRL 2:a technology concept or application is formulated
-
TRL 3:analytical and experimental work produces a proof of concept for a critical function or characteristic
TRLs describe technical maturity, not whether something is ready to be used or sold. At TRL 1–3 the work is usually exploratory.At thisstagethefocus istypicallyclarified, includinguser need, securing the right capability and resources.Appropriatearrangements for IP and other knowledge assetsshould also be put in place.
TRL 4–6: scaling from bench to prototype:
-
TRL 4:technology isvalidatedin a laboratory environment
-
TRL 5:technology isvalidatedin a relevant environment
-
TRL 6:a technology model or prototype isdemonstratedin a relevant environment
At TRL 4–6 there is stronger evidence from testing and demonstration, often in conditions that are closer to intended use.Things such aswhether there is a defined route to adoption, suitable partners or delivery options, funding, and a clear view of regulatory, quality and assurance requirementsmay be considered.Clarification of the position on IP and other knowledge assets also affects what can be shared,developedor licensed.
TRL 7–9:scale‑up, validation and operational use:
-
TRL 7:a prototype isdemonstratedin an operational environment
-
TRL 8:the technology is completed and qualified through test and demonstration
-
TRL 9:the technology is proven through successful mission operations (operational use)
High TRLs indicate that a technology is close to, oroperatingin, an intended environment. They do not, on their own, confirm that an opportunity is ready for wide adoption or market rollout. Readiness for deploymentalsodepends on whether practical steps are in place, such as manufacturing or service delivery capability, compliance with regulatory and quality requirements, evidence of user or customer uptake, and ongoing management of IP and other knowledge assets.
emergingfrom academic environments is often at an early TRL.Itmay require further development before it is ready for licensing or adoption by a spinout company. Translational funding, including incubators,acceleratorsand proofofconcept schemes, can help bridge this gap. This is achievedby supporting technical validation and the safeguarding of IP and widerknowledge assetsas they progress. As technologies move through these levels, active andtimelymanagement of the associated assets supports both their protection and their future commercial potential.
IPԲԲ
Licensing is a common mechanism for enabling the use of IP and widerknowledge assetswhile allowing the original owner toretainownership and oversight. Licensing arrangements can create structured ways for benefits arising from the use of these assets to be shared.Anexampleof this isby linking financial returns to the value generated. They may also support collaboration with established organisations whose technical capabilities, market knowledge or distribution networks can help progress an innovation.In certain sectors, particularly high-technology areaswhere they may beoverlapping patent rights innovatorsmay berequiredto reach licensing deals for multiple patents held by multiple parties.
A licence is a formal agreement between the owner of the IPandknowledge assetand one or more parties who receive permission to use it under defined conditions. Ownershipor control of the assetremainswith the licensor, who sets out how the assets may be accessed,usedor commercialised, and whether financial payments will apply.
Licences can take several forms. A “licence-out” refers to another party using the licensor’s assets, while a “licence-in” grants the institution permission to use assets owned by someone else.Licencesmay involveseveral different assets. They may also involvesingle or multiple licensors orlicensees,andtheymay be exclusive or non-exclusive depending on the scope oftherights granted.Cross licenses allow for two parties to sharethe use of assets from both sides. Sub-licenses enable a licensee to issue further licenses.
Institutions usually set out their approach to licensing within their wider knowledgeexchange and commercialisation frameworkand IP policy. For each project or opportunity, licensing arrangementsshouldconsider how ownership, use and reuse of the relevant assets will be managed.Thisincludescircumstances where rights might return to the institution if an opportunity is notprogressed. Such arrangements can help ensure that IP and associatedknowledge assetscontinue to have routes for future development or application.
Licensing agreements range from simple to complex depending on the context and the level of controlrequired. A clear starting point isan accuraterecord of the key outcomes ofinitialdiscussions, often captured in anon‑bindingIPfocussedHeads of Termsrecord. This document can support negotiations by summarising intentions while leaving detailed rights and responsibilities to be set out in the final contract.
The IPO has achecklist on the benefits of licensing and when licensing isnotappropriate.
You can find out more about licensing IP, the guidance varies on whetheryou’relicensing:
-
patents:Licensing IP
-
trade Marks:License, mortgage, transfer, merge and market your trade mark
-
designs:License, mortgage, sell, change ownership and market your design
In some cases, use of IP assets owned by third parties can be used without permission underexceptions laid out inthe legal framework for thatIP right.However, the scope of the exception should be checked before completing any technology transferactivities,in casea licence-in isrequired.The use ofexceptionsmay requireexpertconsultation.
Spin-out companies
A spin-out company is a new business formed to develop and apply theIP, research outputs or widerknowledge assetsgenerated within a university or research institution. Spin-outsrepresentone pathway for progressingearlystageinnovations toward commercial use.Theytypically require coordination between academics, professionalservicesand external partners.
Establishing a spin-out usually involves bringing together a range of assets and capabilities needed to commercialise the underlying IP.These may include investment, specialist management experience, technicalexpertise,equipmentand suitable facilities. Different commercialisation routes may therefore be considered depending on the resources available and the intended outcomes for theknowledge assetsinvolved. Throughout this process,accurate,comprehensiveand active recordkeeping helps ensure that existing and newly created IP andwiderknowledge assetsare documented,understoodand managed effectively.
Several IPrelated considerations may arise when forming a spinout. These can include how equity will beallocatedbetween the university, academicfoundersand external investors, and how the shareholders’ agreement reflects these positions. It is also important todefineclearlytheIPand wider knowledge assetsto be commercialised, including any associatedknow-how.Anybackground IP required by the spin-outshould also beidentified.
Agreements may set out whether IPand wider knowledge assetswill be licensed or assigned to the company. This mayalsoincludewhether assignment is linked to milestones such as commercial progress or investment levels.
Additionalconsiderations may relate to:
-
the use and ownership oftrade marks
-
reimbursement of patent costs incurred by the university
-
the terms of any licence granted to the spin-out
Licensing arrangements may addressaspectssuch as:
-
royalties
-
responsibility forthe IP and widerknowledge assets
-
prosecution and maintenance
-
action against infringement
-
any ongoing research or technical support
Spinouts may require access to university facilities, equipment or staff, and agreements can define the terms under which this access is provided. These arrangements help ensure that the IP and widerknowledge assetsunderpinning the spinout are understood,recordedand managed in line with institutional policies and processes.Thissupportsclarity for all parties involved.
Socialenterprise
A social enterprise is a businessestablishedto address social or environmental challenges while generating revenue to support its activities. Unlike traditional commercial models, social enterprises balance financial sustainability with social impact and typically reinvest surplus funds to advance their mission.
As with any organisational model that develops or deploysnew ideas, it is useful to consider IP and widerknowledge assets. These include thosethat are brought into, createdwithinor used by the enterprise.
Understanding the parties involved, the origins of theknowledge assetsand the conditions under which those assets can be used or shared supports clarity and responsible management. This includes considering ownership, access, ongoingmanagementand any arrangements that shape how the assets contribute to the enterprise’s mission.
Accurate and comprehensive recordkeeping also playsan important role.It supports the identification, documentation and continued management of the IP andwiderknowledge assetsthat underpin the social enterprise’s work.
Accelerators andIncubators
Accelerators and incubators offer structured environments to support the development ofearlystagestartupsandspin-outs. Accelerators typically provide short, intensive programmes that combine funding, mentoring,trainingand networking to help ventures progress rapidly. Incubators usually run over a longer period and focus more on developing ideas and products.They may provide in-kind support rather than direct funding and often place less emphasis on rapid scaling.
Within these programmes, various activities can involve or generate IP and widerknowledge assets. These may include:
-
structured training programmes
-
seed funding arrangements
-
mentorship from industry experts
-
networking events or investorfocused activities,such as pitch development
Each of these interactions can influence howknowledge assetsare created,sharedor managed.
For startupsparticipatingin accelerators or incubators, understanding IP andknowledge assetsinvolved at an early stage supports clarity as the venture develops. This includesrecognising:
-
what assets are brought into the programme
-
what new assetsemergeduring it
-
hownewassets are managed when engaging with external partners,mentorsor investors
Clear documentation and active recordkeeping help ensure that relevant assets areidentified,trackedand managed in line with institutional policies and programme expectations.
Many accelerator and incubator programmes include elements of IP awareness or training to help participants build a foundation for managing theirknowledge assetseffectively. Where needed, further support may besoughtfromappropriate institutionalor external sources as part of the programme’s wider development activities.Advice for businesses is available from the IPO.
Consultancy
Consultancy isan example ofone of the mechanisms through which knowledgemaymove between a university and external organisations.Thiscansupport exchange in both directions and complementsother routes such as licensing or collaborative research. Consultancy activity can generate new IP and widerknowledge assets.Therefore,it is useful toidentifyhow any resulting assets will be owned,managedand used as part of the contractual arrangements.
IP generated through consultancy may be handled differently depending on the type of consultancy involved.This includes:
-
universitymanaged DzԲܱٲԳ
-
consultancy provided to a spin-out
-
private consultancy undertaken by an academic
Institutional IP and consultancy policies usually set out the relevant principles that guide ownership and use in each of these contexts. Clear,accurate,and active recordkeeping supports this process. It does thisby documenting the assets brought into the consultancy, the assets created during it and the agreed terms that govern their use.
Universities often have policies to ensure that private consultancy does not conflict with institutional consultancy activities or wider commercialisationobjectives. These policies also help ensure that academic staff are aware of any institutional requirements connected with IP, knowledgeassetmanagementor contractual responsibilities. Together, these measures support consistent and transparent handling of IP andwiderknowledge assetsarising from consultancy work.
Contract research
Contract research involves the use of existing knowledge to deliver a defined piece of work funded entirely by an external organisation, such as a business or government body. Unlike collaborative research, the work programme in contract research is typically set by the external partner, and theanticipatedoutcomes are usually well understood rather than exploratory. Because the activity is directed toward the needs of the funder, it often does not fall within the.
Institutional IP policies playan important rolein providing a framework for contract research. They outline the procedures and governance arrangements that guide professional services teams when negotiating contracts, managing the IP and widerknowledge assetsinvolved.Thisensuresthat the interests of all parties are recognised. Clear documentation alsoassistsinidentifyingbackground assets, newly generatedassetsand the conditions under which these may be accessed,usedor transferred.
The Charity Commission has issued guidance on how charitable bodies can undertake contract research or work with businesses in ways thatremaincompatible with charitable status. Universities often adopt a blended approach to sponsored and contract research, with processes for managing grants, broader partnership arrangements,and contract researchoperatingalongside one another. This approach helps institutions manage knowledgeasset use, contractual terms,and compliance requirements in a coherent and transparent manner.
TransferringKnowledge
Universities hold extensive,state-of-the-artknowledge within the disciplines in which theyoperate, and this knowledge is transferred in many ways. Teaching is one important route, but knowledge is also exchanged through a wide range of other activities involving partners outside the university.
Businesses may approach universities to accessexpertise, solve organisationalchallengesor support innovation. This can take many forms, such as commissioning materials testing, seeking analytical support, or drawing on academic insight to develop strategies or processes. These interactions often involve the use, development or exchange of IP and widerknowledge assets.Therefore,making it important to understand what assets are being used and how they are managed.
isavailable.In this case,the IPgeneratedis not always protectable but is a consequence of collectiveknow-howand access to facilities. IP outputs (such as copyright subsisting in any reports or other deliverables) are often only relevant to the client.
Continuing Professional Development (CPD)
Continued Professional Development (CPD) refers to the ongoing process of learning, training and skills enhancement that enables individuals tomaintain, update or advance their professional capabilities. As part of this process, new IP and broaderknowledge assetsmaybecreated.These can includeteaching materials, training content, tools,frameworksand other learning resources.
Because these outputs can hold significant organisational value, they should beidentified,protectedand managed effectively. CPD activities can also generate substantial income for the organisation.Thismeansthat the IP arising from teaching and skills development must be handled withappropriate considerationof ownership, rights of use andlongtermstrategic value.
Clear IP management is particularly important where teaching materials may be used or shared nationally or internationally. Ensuring the organisationretainsappropriate ownershipand control helpsto:
-
safeguard quality
-
maintain brand consistency
-
unlock opportunities for commercialisation,partnershipand wider impact
ShowcasingTechnologyTransfer, CollaborationsandCommercialisation
There are many examples of successful collaborations between universities and businesses thatshowcasegood practice, including:
The UK research community is also working toidentifyand share good practice in knowledge exchange and commercialisation, including through theand its supporting resources.
TheIPOhas a range of materials relevant to knowledge exchange activities, includingguidance on licensingandnon-disclosure agreements. However, it is important to seek professional legal advice when entering into contracts.
There are also wider guidance materials from theIPOto support knowledge exchange activity, includingguidance on valuing intellectual propertyand theintellectual property finance toolkit.