°Ç¸ç³Ô¹Ï

Skip to main content

Rating Manual section 5a: valuation of all property classes

Ambulance stations

This publication is intended for Valuation Officers. It may contain links to internal resources that are not available through this version.

1. Scope

This section applies to all ambulance stations occupied by Ambulance Trusts (NHS).

2. List description and special category code

List Description: Ambulance Station and PremisesÌý

SCAT Code: 010 Suffix G

3. Responsible teams

This is a generalist class and responsibility for valuation will lie with the appropriate business unit. Queries of a complex nature arising from the valuation of individual properties should be referred to the National Valuation Unit (NVU) Class Lead via the Class Co-ordination Team (CCT).

4. Co-ordination

NVU Civic Team has overall responsibility for the co-ordination of this class. The CCT are responsible for the approach to and accuracy and consistency of valuations. The CCT will deliver practice notes describing the valuation basis for revaluation and provide advice as necessary during the life of the rating lists. Caseworkers have a responsibility to:Ìý

  • follow the advice given at all times
  • not depart from the guidance given on appeals or maintenance work without approval from the co-ordination team
  • seek advice from the co-ordination team should any issues arise that are not covered in this instruction

Ambulance stations are a sui-generis class and consequently, as a general rule, only evidence relating to hereditaments in the same mode or category of use is pertinent. See:Ìý

  • Scottish and Newcastle (Retail) Ltd v Williams (VO) (RA 2000 P 119) and the subsequent Court of Appeal decision — Williams (VO) v Scottish and Newcastle Retail and Allied Domecq [RA 2001 P 41)Ìý
  • Re the appeal of Reeves (VO) RA 2007 P168Ìý
  • Dawkins (VO) v Royal Leamington Spa BC and Warwickshire County Council (1961) RVR 291

³§±ð±ðÌýRating Manual Section 2 Part 7 Appendix 2Ìýthereof for guidance on mode and category of use at the material day.Ìý

In some circumstances it may be appropriate to have regard to rental evidence derived from other modes or categories of use such as general garaging/light industrial — see 8. below and Re the appeal of Reeves (VO) RA 2007.

6. Survey requirements

6.1 Method of MeasurementÌý

Ambulance stations may be valued by either the rentals method or by reference to the contractor’s basis. In both instances the method of measurement will be to Gross Internal Area (GIA). It will be necessary to ascertain the basis of valuation prior to inspection as different additional information will be required. In case of doubt sufficient measurement and survey information should be recorded to enable valuations to be carried out using either basis.Ìý

6.2 DescriptionÌý

Ambulance stations comprise garage and preparation areas for vehicles with associated stores (such as for drugs and PPE), sluice room/dirty utility room, staff locker, changing and mess rooms with toilet facilities and ancillary space such as plant rooms. Other accommodation, such as administration offices, meeting rooms or training facilities are also commonly present. Some ambulance stations may also house the Hazardous Area Response Team (HART).Ìý

A few stations are equipped with a fuel pump to refuel ambulance vehicles and vehicle workshops. There will normally be external hard standings and possibly a communications mast.Ìý

From 2010 some Ambulance Service Trusts (ASTs) have re-organised the provision of ambulance services and have consolidated and modernised their estates by fully implementing a hub and spoke estates model with make ready operational system. Co-location with the other blue light services or local authorities is also common.Ìý

6.3 RequirementsÌý

A) Unit of AssessmentÌý

The principles referred to inÌýRating Manual Section 2 Part 2 2. Identification of the hereditamentÌýshould be adhered to. In cases of difficulty advice from the Technical Advisor/NVU specialist should be obtained. The normal approach should be applied to the identification of hereditaments and no attempt should be made to aggregate property which on normal rating principles constitutes more than one hereditament. Where co-located with other emergency services or other occupiers it is possible that unit of assessment issues may arise, particularly where some facilities are shared. In these circumstances it is essential the rateable occupier of each part is ascertained, and the correct unit(s) of assessment identified.Ìý

B) Survey DetailÌý

The following information is required:Ìý

  • a plan (CAD) or otherwise should be obtained where available and check dimensions made on site as necessary, otherwise a plan should be drawn up
  • site layout plan
  • method of construction — for example, temporary, traditional/permanent brick and tile or steel framed including roof type, for example, flat or pitched
  • when usingÌýthe rentals method in addition to total GIAÌýdescription and GIAs of ancillary accommodationÌýof differing quality than the rest of the building, such as offices, stores, crew room, bunk room/living quarters, station office, kitchen area, equipment store, sluice room — cleaning equipment, clean linen store, oxygen cylinder store and shower facilities recorded separately; ambulance bays — number and dimensions including height, together with description of internal finish should also be notedÌý
  • where the contractor’s basis is to be the method of valuation only the GIA of individual building(s) and any extensions but a note should be made of the proportion of the total area which is given over to office accommodation — office accommodation in this context should be taken to include rooms used for support and admin purposes (including ancillary facilities like kitchens and toilets primarily used by admin staff) as distinct from space used for the garaging and maintenance of vehicles and accommodation for their crews
  • flat roof areaÌý
  • age of all buildings/extensionsÌý
  • description and detail of services to the hereditament, for example, heating, air conditioning, security systems (to include CCTV, barriers, gates and perimeter fencing), lifts, solar panels and wind turbines
  • number of car parking spaces for staff and visitors or/and parking area, the nature of the surface, and a note of the extent of site landscaping
  • the site area
  • a description of the means of access to the highway and a note of the proximity to major trunk/arterial/ring roads

7. Survey capture

Survey information including plans are to be stored on Electronic Document Records Management (EDRM). Where the ambulance station is to be valued using the Contractors basis the GIA of the building(s) is to be entered onto the valuation spreadsheet held on the non-bulk server (NBS). Where the ambulance station is to be valued using the rentals method then data, utilising appropriate Bulk Class Indicator (BCI) and sub location codes, should be captured within the Rating Support Application (RSA).

8. Valuation approach

The rental method should be applied only where there is either:Ìý

  • direct rental evidence
  • rental evidence derived from the letting of other ambulance stations
  • sufficient evidence from other localities to establish that the rents relating to ambulance stations are at a level commensurate with other modes or categories of use such as general garaging/light industrial

When considering rents relating to ambulance stations care should be taken to ensure that they can be suitably adjusted to accord with the rating hypothesis and are not otherwise of a nature which may prejudice their evidential weight — for example, lettings between connected parties, sale and leaseback.

As this class of hereditament does not lend itself to valuation using the receipts and expenditure method then in the absence of sufficient rental evidence to carry out a valuation using the rentals method the contractor’s basis of valuation should be applied by reference to Rating Manual: Section 4 Part 3 The Contractor’s Basis of ValuationÌýand the practice note applicable to the relevant Rating List.

8.1 Superfluity at Ambulance StationsÌý

With the amalgamation of ASTs and consequent operational changes surplus accommodation may result in some instances and thus superfluity may need to be considered. Superfluity can be taken into account but only after careful investigation of the root cause and ensuring that space is genuinely redundant. Superfluity is not to be assumed and its presence and valuation effect it is for the ratepayer or agent to demonstrate. When considering the merits of a claim for superfluity a consideration of the features and characteristics of the modern equivalent, in those AST areas where such stations existed at the antecedent valuation date (AVD), will be of assistance. In considering this matter no account should be taken of changes to the funding arrangements of the ratepayer body subsequently.Ìý

9. Valuation Support

Valuations are to be carried out using the dedicated ambulance stations spreadsheet held on the NBS. Valuations on the rental/comparative method are to be carried out on the Rating Support Application.

Practice note 2026

1. Market appraisal

There are 10 NHS Ambulance Service Trusts (AST) in England with the Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust covering the whole of Wales.

ASTs continue to review their estate requirements to match modern demand profiles. It is recognised that older sites are generally more expensive to maintain and that costs can be reduced if trusts consolidate and modernise their estates by fully implementing a hub and spoke estates model with make ready operational system. Co-location with the other blue light services or local authorities is also common with site sharing also seen as having particular cost advantages in rural areas.

2. Changes from the 2023 practice note

This practice note follows the same principles as the 2023 Practice Note. Stage 1 costs, Stage 2 obsolescence and land values have been updated.

3. Ratepayer discussions

No discussions have taken place with ASTs or their agents.

4. Valuation scheme

Ambulance stations are a sui generis class for rating purposes and as such will mainly be valued on the contractor’s basis. That said, where sufficient rental evidence exists within the class and geographic locality a rentals approach should be adopted. This is unlikely to be the case with purpose-built stations however more likely where vacant and to let the whole hereditament is akin to a garage, workshop or industrial property. Valuations of these hereditaments are to be carried out using the RSA by way of an appropriate scheme.

In circumstances where the contractor’s basis of valuation is deemed appropriate, it is to be applied in accordance with Rating Manual: Section 4 Part 3 using the guidance below in relation to each stage of the valuation process.

The costs shown in this section are for ease of reference. In all cases where a cost guide code is shown that must be input into the NBS template, not the costs shown here. Where the cost guide code shows options, the costs shown in this practice note should be used to aid selection. Should the cost guide show different costs to those shown in a current version of this practice note, please refer to the NVU Class Lead via the CCT.

The costs stated in Appendix A apply to standalone ambulance stations. Occupations that share part of a ‘blue light emergency hub’ should be considered on their own merits and advice sought from the CCT and NVU Lead where necessary.

4.1 Stage 1 — Estimated replacement cost (ERC)

(i) Building costs

Normally, with the exception of areas that are patently not used at the antecedent valuation date (AVD) and have no prospect of being used, the actual GIA should be used to calculate the Estimated Replacement Cost (Stage 1) of the building. Guidance in relation to the treatment of superfluity is given in the Rating Manual section relating to ambulance stations and further advice should be sought from the CCT and NVU Lead where required.

(ii) External works

The cost of external works is to be added in accordance with Appendix B.

(iii) Location factors

Where appropriate costs should be adjusted for location by reference to the Location Factors set down in the 2026 Rating Cost Guide and included at Appendix C.

(iv) Contract size adjustment

An adjustment for contract size is to be made to the building cost in accordance with the 2026 Rating Cost Guide and replicated in Appendix D below.

(v) Professional fees and charges

Fees should be added at the percentages shown in the 2026 Rating Cost Guide. For convenience these are shown below in Appendix E.

4.2 Stage 2 — Age and obsolescence

The age and obsolescence allowances are set out in Rating Manual: Section 4: Part 3: Practice note — Revaluation 2026: The contractor’s basis: Age and obsolescence allowances. The civic scale is applicable to the individual blocks of permanent buildings and is replicated at Appendix F.

For the avoidance of doubt the age of the building is to be taken as the date the building was completed.

The main civic buildings obsolesce scales take into account the following salient points:

a. The revised age and obsolescence scale has been agreed to represent the combined age-related physical depreciation along with functional obsolescence and technological redundancy exhibited by buildings of each age typical for their quality, specification and condition. It is anticipated that the stated allowances will be adopted in the majority of cases and only either moderated or increased in exceptional circumstances.

b. Extensions are to be given an allowance appropriate to their age unless of a lower specification than would be expected of a building of that age. Where a lower specification is used the allowance should be increased to a level appropriate to reflect the specification of the building as a whole.

c. In respect of physical depreciation, the above scales are intended to reflect normal wear and tear and/or deterioration due to the age of the building. The scales assume an average degree of cyclical refurbishment work will have been undertaken, to include whole or partial renewal of building sub-components, most particularly relating to mechanical and electrical services and internal fit-out, but also including periodic renewal of roof coverings and windows.

d. It follows from the above that no adjustment away from the scales is required in the majority of cases where older buildings have been subject to modernisation and refurbishment works, as these are explicitly assumed to have occurred. An exception to this would be for a building taken back to shell and reconstructed with significant renewal of structural elements, where an abatement of age-related physical obsolescence may be required.

e. An example of a building requiring an abatement of the allowances provided by the scales (due to the mitigation of physical depreciation) would be where a major renovation has occurred utilising the original building foundations, frame (including upper floors) but with comprehensive replacement of the external envelope (walls, windows), a complete internal refit and wholescale replacement of mechanical and electrical services.

f. Conversely, the above scales will be insufficient to reflect physical obsolescence in cases where buildings are substantially un-modernised and, in any case, the scales do not apply in instances where the hereditament is not repairable at reasonable cost and where it falls to be valued rebus sic stantibus.

g. To qualify as a substantially un-modernised building it is expected that the building will predominantly have the following:

  • single glazed windows
  • original internal layout
  • original ceiling height, with no suspended ceilings
  • original external walls
  • pre 1980 internal finishes (flooring, ceiling and walls, internal doors and fixtures and fittings)

h. In respect of functional and technological obsolescence, for buildings that remain in operational use, the scales include adjustments to reflect functional and technological deficiencies observable in buildings typical of their original period of construction but taking account of the level of assumed cyclical refurbishment reflected in the physical depreciation element of the scales.

i. The type of functional and technological obsolescence factors already reflected in the scales include the following:

  • poor energy efficiency and/or environmental sustainability
  • inappropriate layout inhibiting flexible and efficient space utilisation
  • modern health and safety, fire or building regulations that preclude or limit the original purposes of the building
  • dated design practices that restrict modern usage (such as lack of, or minimal, floor and ceiling voids)
  • the absence of modern space heating or air conditioning systems within a building

j. It follows that only where buildings display specific functional deficiencies or issues of technological redundancy, that are atypical for their age, consideration should be given to applying an additional allowance.

k. One indicator that additional functional obsolescence is present such that the allowance provided by the scales should be adjusted is the presence of new and/or replacement facilities making the existing building surplus. Such replacement or other material redundancy should be considered and may result in the total redundancy of the pre-existing building, such as 100% obsolescence.

Flat roof allowances

Permanent buildings built prior to 2005 with a flat roof are to receive an additional allowance. The allowance is not to be applied to temporary buildings, stores, workshops or garages.

  • £80³¾Â² ARC of the footprint of the flat roof for buildings constructed up to and including 2004
  • no allowance for flat roofs constructed from 2005 and onwards

Where a building has varying roof types a reasonable apportionment should be made to arrive at the allowance.

What is flat as opposed to a pitched roof will generally be self-evident. In instances where an allowance is sought for pitched roofing caseworkers should seek advice from the National Valuation Unit before proceeding.

4.3 Stage 3 — Land value

The developed land value additions are shown in Appendix G below and are taken as percentages of the total aggregate adjusted replacement cost. Developed land is defined as land consisting of the footprint of all buildings, associated landscaped areas, roadways, car parks, hard standings, and paths.

Any additional land on the site will be viewed as undeveloped land and valued as amenity land for the appropriate region as detailed in the Practice note 2026: Land values for contractor’s basis.

4.4 Stage 4 — Decapitalisation rate

The adjusted replacement cost (ARC) of the buildings is aggregated with the land value, and then de-capitalised to an annual equivalent at the prescribed (higher) rate applicable in respect of the 2026 Rating List.

4.5 Stage 5 — End Adjustments

Any advantage or disadvantage, which might affect the value of the occupation of the hereditament as a whole, should be reflected at this stage. An adjustment under this head should not duplicate adjustments made elsewhere. The value has already been adjusted prior to Stage 5 for:

  • physical and functional obsolescence including age related build quality
  • location factor
  • flat roof allowance

Appendix A — Building costs

Ambulance stations
Size (m²) Cost guide code Cost per square metre (m²) GIA
Less than 1,000m² 60F00B £1,866
Equal to or more than 1,000m² 60F00E £2,020

Appendix B — Additions for external works

An addition for external works should always be made even for hereditaments with no tangible land outside of the building footprint. Typical external works comprise the following:

  • paths, paving, vehicle parking areas, access roads, boundary fences, gates, lighting, landscaping
  • foul and surface water manholes, pipes and connections
  • incoming mains electric, gas, water, telephone and other services
Number Building ratio and description External works addition
1 Town centre or island site typically with 90% or greater building ratio, no more than a small yard or garden area, no external ambulance or car parking 5%
2 As 1 above, but typically with an 80% to 90% building ratio, very limited parking, external lighting, landscaping and some boundary fencing 10%
3 Site typically with 50%/75% building ratio, some landscaping around buildings, secure boundary fencing, ambulance parking with limited general parking, external lighting and landscaping 17.5%
4 As 3 above, but typically with 35%/50% building ratio, landscaping around buildings, secure boundary fencing, external lighting, general parking within the hereditament which falls short of full requirements 25%
5 Site typically with about 25%/35% building ratio, landscaping around buildings, secure boundary fencing, external lighting and adequate general parking within the hereditament for all staff and other users 30%

Notes:

  1. The plot ratio is the building GIA expressed as a percentage of the total site area (including building footprint).
  2. An appropriate percentage addition should be chosen from the above ranges to reflect the extent of external works within the hereditament using plot ratio as an indicative guide only.

Appendix C — Location adjustments

N.B. The Regions referred to are administrative areas and are not significant boundaries.

North East region
Area Location factor
Durham County 0.89
Northumberland 0.93
Tees Valley 0.92
Tyne and Wear 0.89
North West region
Area Location factor
Cheshire 1.01
Greater Manchester 1.01
Lancashire 1.01
Merseyside 1.01
Cumbria 1.02
Yorkshire and Humberside region
Area Location factor
East Riding and North Lincolnshire 0.90
North Yorkshire 0.96
South Yorkshire 0.92
West Yorkshire 0.90
South West region
Area Location factor
Cornwall 1.03
Devon 1.00
Dorset 1.03
Gloucestershire 1.02
North Somerset 1.01
Somerset 0.99
Wiltshire 1.01
East midlands region
Area Location factor
Derbyshire 1.03
Leicestershire and Rutland 1.02
Lincolnshire 1.02
Northamptonshire 1.07
Nottinghamshire 1.01
West midlands region
Area Location factor
Herefordshire 0.94
Shropshire 0.97
Staffordshire 0.95
Warwickshire 1.00
West Midlands 0.97
Worcestershire 1.00
East of England region
Area Location factor
Bedfordshire 1.03
Cambridgeshire 0.99
Essex 1.02
Hertfordshire 1.06
Norfolk 0.95
Suffolk 0.96
South East region (excluding London)
Area Location factor
Berkshire 1.09
Buckinghamshire 1.08
East Sussex 1.10
Hampshire 1.06
Isle of Wight 1.06
Kent 1.10
Oxfordshire 1.05
Surrey 1.15
West Sussex 1.09
North Wales
Area Location factor
Flintshire 0.88
Conwy 0.93
Denbighshire 0.89
Gwynedd 0.96
Isle of Anglesey 0.94
Wrexham 0.91
Mid Wales
Area Location factor
Carmarthenshire 0.97
Ceredigion 0.98
Powys 0.96
Pembrokeshire 0.91
South Wales
Area Location factor
Blaenau Gwent 0.95
Bridgend 0.92
Caerphilly 0.93
Cardiff 0.93
Monmouthshire 0.98
Neath Port Talbot 0.88
Newport 0.95
Rhondda, Cynon, Taff 0.92
Swansea 0.93
Torfaen 0.90
Vale of Glamorgan 0.96
Central London North
Area Location factor
Camden 1.30
City of London 1.22
Hammersmith and Fulham 1.30
Islington 1.27
Kensington and Chelsea 1.32
Westminster 1.29
Central London South
Area Location factor
Lambeth 1.26
Southwark 1.27
Wandsworth 1.28
Greater London North East
Area Location factor
Hackney 1.23
Haringey 1.31
Newham 1.17
Tower Hamlets 1.24
Barking and Dagenham 1.16
Enfield 1.17
Havering 1.08
Redbridge 1.14
Waltham Forest 1.16
Greater London North West
Area Location factor
Barnet 1.22
Brent 1.20
Ealing 1.26
Harrow 1.17
Hillingdon 1.15
Hounslow 1.14
Greater London South East
Area Location factor
Bexley 1.23
Bromley 1.19
Croydon 1.22
Greenwich 1.23
Lewisham 1.19
Greater London South West
Area Location factor
Kingston Upon Thames 1.24
Merton 1.23
Richmond Upon Thames 1.20
Sutton 1.18

Appendix D — Contract size adjustment

The adjustment for contract size should be made having regard to the total ERC (after adjustment for location but before the addition for fees) in accordance with the below scales.

ERC £ % Adjustment
Up to 0.25 million + 10% max
0.5 million 8%
0.75 million 6%
1.0 million 4%
1.5 million 3%
2.0 million 2%
3.0 million 1%
4.0 million 0%
5.0 million -0.5%
6.0 million -1%
8.0 million -1.5%
10.0 million -2%
15.0 million -3%
18.0 million -4%
20.0 million -5%
25.0 million -6%
35.0 million -9%
Over 40.0 million - 10% MAX

NB. Intermediate figures may be interpolated.

Appendix E — Fees and professional charges

Fees should be added at the percentages shown in the 2026 Rating Cost Guide. For convenience these are shown below inclusive of the 2% complexity addition. Note that minimum fees may apply to counter inversion.

Size of contract % Adjustment
Sums up to £750,000 14%
£750,000 to £1,499,000 13.5%
£1,500,000 to £3,999,999 11.5%
£4,000,000 to £7,499,999 10.5%
£7,500,000 to £14,999,999 9.5%
Over £15,000,000 9%

Appendix F — Age and obsolescence allowances

Civic buildings obsolescence allowance

Age % Obsolescence
2026 0.00%
2025 0.75%
2024 1.50%
2023 2.50%
2022 3.50%
2021 4.75%
2020 6.00%
2019 7.25%
2018 8.50%
2017 10.00%
2016 11.25%
2015 12.75%
2014 14.25%
2013 15.75%
2012 17.25%
2011 18.75%
2010 20.25%
2009 21.75%
2008 23.25%
2007 24.50%
2006 26.00%
2005 27.50%
2004 28.75%
2003 30.00%
2002 31.25%
2001 32.50%
2000 33.75%
1999 35.00%
1998 36.00%
1997 37.00%
1996 38.00%
1995 39.00%
1994 40.00%
1993 40.75%
1992 41.50%
1991 42.25%
1990 43.00%
1989 43.75%
1988 44.50%
1987 45.00%
1986 45.50%
1985 46.00%
1984 46.50%
1983 49.25%
1982 52.25%
1981 55.00%
1980 58.00%
1979 58.25%
1978 58.50%
1977 58.50%
1976 58.75%
1975 59.00%
1974 59.00%
1973 59.25%
1972 59.25%
1971 60.00%
1970 60.00%
1969 60.00%
1968 60.00%
1967 60.00%
1966 60.00%
1965 60.00%
1964 60.00%
1963 60.00%
1962 60.00%
1961 60.00%
1960 60.00%
1959 57.50%
1958 55.00%
Pre 1958 55.00% Max Allowance

Appendix G — Land value additions

Developed land

The value of the developed land shall be taken to be the following percentages of the aggregate of the ARC of all buildings and external works. Central London North and South are to be valued on their site area direct to £/ha.

Geographical location % Addition to ARC
Central London N Bespoke approach — seek advice from the NVU Class Lead
Central London S Bespoke approach — seek advice from the NVU Class Lead
GLNW 64.25%
GLSW 45.50%
GLNE 42.75%
GLSE 42.75%
North East 4.25%
North West 10.00%
Yorkshire & Humberside 11.75%
East Midlands 9.00%
West Midlands 13.25%
East of England 13.25%
South East 14.75%
South West 14.50%
Mid & North Wales 3.75%
South Wales (excluding Cardiff) 6.25%
Cardiff 14.75%

The definitions of the areas referred to above can be found in the 2026 land value practice note.

Practice note 2023

1. Market appraisal

Ambulance Trusts continue to review their estate requirements to match modern demand profiles.

It is recognised that older sites are generally more expensive to maintain and that costs can be reduced if trusts consolidate and modernise their estates by fully implementing a hub and spoke estates model with make ready operational system. Co-location with the other blue light services or local authorities is also common with site sharing is also seen as having particular cost advantages in rural areas.

Examples of shared service facilities and standalone ambulance stations can be readily identified by searching the internet.

2. Changes from the previous practice note

Changes to the level of costs, fees, allowances and land values associated with the contractor’s basis of valuation.

3. Ratepayer discussions

No discussions with the Ambulance Trusts or their representatives have taken place.

4. Valuation scheme

Ambulance Stations are a sui generis class for rating purposes and as such will mainly be valued on the contractor’s basis. That said, where sufficient rental evidence exists within the class and geographic locality a rentals approach should be adopted. This is unlikely to be the case with purpose-built stations however more likely where vacant and to let the wholeÌýhereditamentÌýis akin to a garage/workshop/industrial property.

In circumstances where the contractor’s basis of valuation is deemed appropriate, it is to be applied in accordance with the Valuation Office Rating Manual Section 4: Part 3: The Contractor’s Basis of Valuation, using the guidance below in relation to each stage of the valuation process.

The costs shown in this section are for ease of reference. In all cases where a cost guide code is shown it is this that which must be input into the NBS template, not the costs shown here. Where the cost guide code shows options, the costs shown in this practice note should be used to aid selection. Should the cost guide show different costs to those shown in a current version of this practice note, please refer to the CCT.

The costs stated inÌýAppendix AÌýapply to standalone ambulance stations. Occupations that share part of a ‘blue light emergency hub’ should be considered on their own merits and advice sought from the CCT and NVU Lead where necessary.

4.1 Stage 1 — Estimated Replacement Cost

Building Costs

With the exception of areas that are not used at theÌýAVDÌýand have no prospect of being used, the actual GIA of the station should be used to calculate the Estimated Replacement Cost (Stage 1) of theÌýhereditamentÌýin accordance with Appendix A. Guidance in relation to the treatment of superfluity is given in the Rating Manual section relating to ambulance stations.

External Works

The cost of external works is to be added in accordance withÌýAppendix B.

Location Factors

Location factors should be applied in accordance with the Valuation Office Cost Guide 2023 and shown atÌýAppendix C.

Contract Size Adjustment

An adjustment for contract size is to be made to the building cost in accordance with the 2023 Valuation Office Cost Guide and replicated inÌýAppendix DÌýbelow.

Professional Fees and Charges

Professional fees and charges are to be added for in accordance with the guidance given in the 2023 Cost Guide and shown atÌýAppendix E.

4.2 Stage 2 — Age and Obsolescence

The ERC established at Stage 1 above is converted to ARC by applying an age and obsolescence allowance.

The standard age and obsolescence allowances (non-industrial) to be applied to the ERC of the individual blocks of permanent buildings are set out inÌýRating Manual: section 4 part 3 — the Contractor’s basis of valuation. Adjustments for age and obsolescence should be made in accordance withÌýAppendix F.

The scales contained inÌýAppendix FÌýtake into account the following salient points:

a. The age and obsolescence scales set out in the rating manual have been agreed to represent the combined age-related physical depreciation along with functional obsolescence and technological redundancy exhibited by buildings of each age typical for their quality, specification and condition. It is anticipated that the stated allowances will be adopted in the majority of cases and only either moderated or increased in exceptional circumstances.

b. Extensions are to be given an allowance appropriate to their age unless of a lower specification than would be expected of a building of that age in which case the allowance should be increased to a level appropriate to reflect the specification of the building as a whole.

c. In respect of physical depreciation, the above scales are intended to reflect normal wear and tear and/or deterioration due to the age of the building. The scales assume an average degree of cyclical refurbishment work will have been undertaken, to include whole or partial renewal of building sub-components, most particularly relating to mechanical and electrical services and internal fit-out, but also including periodic renewal of roof coverings and windows.

d. It follows from the above that no adjustment away from the scales is required in the majority of cases where older buildings have been subject to modernisation and refurbishment works, as these are explicitly assumed to have occurred. An exception to this would be for a building taken back to shell and reconstructed with significant renewal of structural elements, where an abatement of age-related physical obsolescence may be required.

e. An example of a building requiring an abatement of the allowances provided by the scales (due to the mitigation of physical depreciation) would be where a major renovation has occurred utilising the original building foundations, frame (including upper floors) but with comprehensive replacement of the external envelope (walls, windows), a complete internal refit and wholescale replacement of mechanical and electrical services.

f.ÌýConversely, the above scales will be insufficient to reflect physical obsolescence in cases where buildings are substantially un-modernised and in any case, the scales do not apply in instances where theÌýhereditamentÌýis not repairable at reasonable cost and where it falls to be valued rebus sic stantibus.

g. To qualify as a substantially un-modernised building it is expected that the building will predominantly have the following:

  • single glazed windows

  • original internal layout

  • original ceiling height, with no suspended ceilings

  • original external walls

  • pre 1980 internal finishes (flooring, ceiling and walls, internal doors and fixtures and fittings)

This is not intended to be applicable to prestige buildings that add character and esteem to theÌýhereditament.

h. In respect of functional and technological obsolescence, for buildings that remain in operational use, the scales include adjustments to reflect functional and technological deficiencies observable in buildings typical of their original period of construction but taking account of the level of assumed cyclical refurbishment reflected in the physical depreciation element of the scales.

i. The type of functional and technological obsolescence factors already reflected in the scales include the following:

  • poor energy efficiency and/or environmental sustainability

  • inappropriate layout inhibiting flexible and efficient space utilization

  • modern health and safety, fire or building regulations that preclude or limit the original purposes of the building

  • dated design practices that restrict modern usage (such as lack of, or minimal, floor and ceiling voids)

  • the absence of modern space heating or air conditioning systems within a building

j.ÌýIt follows that only where buildings display specific functional deficiencies or issues of technological redundancy, that are atypical for their age, the age-related allowances provided by the scales should be increased.

k. One indicator that additional functional obsolescence is present such that the allowance provided by the scales should be adjusted is the presence of new and/or replacement facilities making the existing building surplus. Such replacement or other material redundancy should be considered and may result in the total redundancy of the pre-existing building, such as 100% obsolescence.

l. If at theÌýAntecedent Valuation Date, where there are buildings, or parts of buildings, that through an established pattern of use have been unused for a number of years the area of these buildings, or parts of buildings, is to be excluded from the GIA.

m. This adjustment takes into account deficiencies in the actual building from an occupational point of view, which is not reflected in the ERC.

4.2.1 Flat Roof Allowance

Permanent buildings built prior to 2005 with a flat roof are to receive an additional allowance. The allowance is not to be applied to temporary buildings, stores, workshops or garages.

  1. a) £80 per m2 ARC of the footprint of the flat roof for buildings constructed up to and including 2004. b) No allowance for flat roofs constructed from 2005 and onwards

  2. Where a building has varying roof types a reasonable apportionment should be made to arrive at the allowance.

  3. What is flat as opposed to a pitched roof will generally be self-evident. Flat roofing allowances will automatically apply here to all types of flat roof. In instances where an allowance is sought for pitched roofing caseworkers should seek advice from the NVU before proceeding.

The age and obsolescence allowance applied to the buildings should also be applied to the external works (averaged as necessary). The spreadsheet in the NBS application will automatically do this.

4.3 Stage 3 — Land Value

The value of the developed land should be added in accordance withÌýAppendix G.

Developed land is defined as land consisting of the footprint of all buildings, associated landscaped areas, roadways, car parks, hard standings and paths. Any additional land on the site will be viewed as undeveloped land and valued as amenity land for the appropriate region as detailed in the 2023 Land Value Practice Note.

4.4 Stage 4 — De-capitalisation Rate

The higher statutory de-capitalisation rate should be applied to the ARC to arrive at an annual equivalent.

4.5 Stage 5 — End Adjustments

Any advantage or disadvantage which might affect the value of the occupation of the hereditament as a whole should be reflected at this last stage. An adjustment under this head should not duplicate adjustments made elsewhere and most buildings will not warrant further allowances at this stage.

Appendix A

Building Costs

Ambulance stations
Size (m²) Cost Guide Reference £/³¾2
&±ô³Ù;1,000³¾Â² 60F00B £1,570
≥1,000³¾Â² 60F00E £1,700

Appendix B

The Addition for External Works

Typical external works comprise the following:

  • paths, paving, vehicle parking areas, access roads, boundary fences, gates, lighting, landscaping
  • foul and surface water manholes, pipes and connections
  • incoming mains electric, gas, water and telephone services
Building ratio/description External works addition
1 Town centre or island site typically with 90% or greater building ratio, no more than a small yard or garden area, no external ambulance or car parking. 5%
2 As 1 above, but typically with an 80% to 90% building ratio, very limited parking, external lighting, landscaping and some boundary fencing. 10%
3 Site typically with 50%/75% building ratio, some landscaping around buildings, secure boundary fencing, ambulance parking with limited general parking, external lighting and landscaping 17.5%
4 As 3 above, but typically with 35%/50% building ratio, landscaping around buildings, secure boundary fencing, external lighting, general parking within the hereditament which falls short of full requirements. 25%
5 Site typically with about 25%/35% building ratio, landscaping around buildings, secure boundary fencing, external lighting and adequate general parking within the hereditament for all staff and other users. 30%

Notes

The plot ratio is the building GIA expressed as a percentage of the total site area (including building footprint). An appropriate percentage addition should be chosen from the above ranges to reflect the extent of external works within the hereditament using plot ratio as an indicative guide only.

Where aerials, masts, solar panels and wind turbines are present, regard should be had to cost additions outlined in the relevant section of the Valuation Office 2023 cost guide.

Appendix C

Location adjustment

N.B. The Regions referred to are administrative areas and are not significant boundaries.

NORTH EAST REGION Ìý Ìý NORTH WEST REGION Ìý
Durham County 0.91 Ìý Cheshire 0.97
Northumberland 0.95 Ìý Greater Manchester 0.97
Tees Valley 0.94 Ìý Lancashire 0.97
Tyne & Wear 0.91 Ìý Merseyside 0.97
Ìý Ìý Ìý Cumbria 0.98
Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý
YORKSHIRE & HUMBERSIDE REGION Ìý Ìý SOUTH WESTERN REGION Ìý
East Riding and North Lincolnshire 0.92 Ìý Cornwall 1.05
North Yorkshire 0.98 Ìý Devon 1.01
South Yorkshire 0.94 Ìý Dorset 1.04
West Yorkshire 0.92 Ìý Gloucestershire 1.03
Ìý Ìý Ìý North Somerset 1.02
Ìý Ìý Ìý Somerset 1.01
Ìý Ìý Ìý Wiltshire 1.03
Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý
EAST MIDLANDS REGION Ìý Ìý WEST MIDLANDS REGION Ìý
Derbyshire 1.05 Ìý Herefordshire 0.92
Leicestershire and Rutland 1.04 Ìý Shropshire 0.95
Lincolnshire 1.03 Ìý Staffordshire 0.94
Northamptonshire 1.09 Ìý Warwickshire 0.98
Nottinghamshire 1.03 Ìý West Midlands 0.95
Ìý Ìý Ìý Worcestershire 0.98
Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý
EAST OF ENGLAND REGION Ìý Ìý SOUTH EAST REGION (EXCLUDING LONDON) Ìý
Bedfordshire 1.04 Ìý Berkshire 1.08
Cambridgeshire 1.00 Ìý Buckinghamshire 1.07
Essex 1.03 Ìý East Sussex 1.09
Hertfordshire 1.07 Ìý Hampshire 1.05
Norfolk 0.96 Ìý Isle of Wight 1.05
Suffolk 0.97 Ìý Kent 1.09
Ìý Ìý Ìý Oxfordshire 1.04
Ìý Ìý Ìý Surrey 1.13
Ìý Ìý Ìý West Sussex 1.08
WALES Ìý Ìý CENTRAL LONDON SOUTH Ìý
North Wales Ìý Ìý Lambeth 1.28
Flintshire 0.89 Ìý Southwark 1.28
Conwy 0.93 Ìý Wandsworth 1.30
Denbighshire 0.90 Ìý Ìý Ìý
Gwynedd 0.97 Ìý GREATER LONDON NORTH EAST Ìý
Isle of Anglesey 0.95 Ìý Hackney 1.25
Wrexham 0.91 Ìý Haringey 1.31
Ìý Ìý Ìý Newham 1.18
Mid Wales Ìý Ìý Tower Hamlets 1.26
Carmarthenshire 0.98 Ìý Barking and Dagenham 1.18
Ceredigion 0.99 Ìý Enfield 1.18
Powys 0.97 Ìý Havering 1.09
Pembrokeshire 0.92 Ìý Redbridge 1.15
Ìý Ìý Ìý Waltham Forest 1.18
Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý
South Wales Ìý Ìý GREATER LONDON NORTH WEST Ìý
Blaenau Gwent 0.96 Ìý Barnet 1.23
Bridgend 0.93 Ìý Brent 1.22
Caerphilly 0.93 Ìý Ealing 1.27
Cardiff 0.94 Ìý Harrow 1.18
Monmouthshire 0.99 Ìý Hillingdon 1.16
Neath Port Talbot 0.88 Ìý Hounslow 1.16
Newport 0.95 Ìý Ìý Ìý
Rhondda, Cynon, Taff 0.93 Ìý GREATER LONDON SOUTH EAST Ìý
Swansea 0.93 Ìý Bexley 1.25
Torfaen 0.91 Ìý Bromley 1.21
Vale of Glamorgan 0.97 Ìý Croydon 1.24
Ìý Ìý Ìý Greenwich 1.24
CENTRAL LONDON NORTH Ìý Ìý Lewisham 1.21
Camden 1.32 Ìý Ìý Ìý
City of London 1.24 Ìý GREATER LONDON SOUTH WEST Ìý
Hammersmith & Fulham 1.32 Ìý Kingston Upon Thames 1.26
Islington 1.29 Ìý Merton 1.24
Kensington & Chelsea 1.34 Ìý Richmond Upon Thames 1.22
Westminster 1.30 Ìý Sutton 1.20
Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý

Appendix D

Contract Size Adjustment

The adjustment for contract size should be made having regard to the total ERC (after adjustment for location but before the addition for fees) in accordance with the below scales.

ERC £ % Adjustment
Up to 0.25 million Ìý + 10% max
0.5 million Ìý 8%
0.75 million Ìý 6%
1.0 million Ìý 4%
1.5 million Ìý 3%
2.0 million Ìý 2%
3.0 million Ìý 1%
4.0 million Ìý 0%
5.0 million Ìý -0.5%
6.0 million Ìý -1%
8.0 million Ìý -1.5%
10.0 million Ìý -2%
15.0 million Ìý -3%
18.0 million Ìý -4%
20.0 million Ìý -5%
25.0 million Ìý -6%
35.0 million Ìý -9%
Over 40.0 million Ìý - 10% MAX
Ìý Ìý NB. Intermediate figures may be interpolated.

Appendix E

The Addition for Fees

Fees should be added at the percentages shown in the Valuation Office published Cost Guide at Section 7. For convenience these are shown below inclusive of the 2% complexity addition. Note that minimum fees may apply to counter inversion.

Size of Contract % Adjustment
Sums up to £750,000 14%
£750,000 to £1,499,000 13.5%
£1,500,000 to £3,999,999 11.5%
£4,000,000 to £7,499,999 10.5%
£7,500,000 to £14,999,999 9.5%
Over £15,000,000 9%

Appendix F

Age and obsolescence scales

Table 1: Civic Buildings Obsolescence Allowances — Ambulance Stations

Age % Obsolescence Age % Obsolescence
2023 0.00% 1986 43.75%
2022 0.75% 1985 44.50%
2021 1.50% 1984 45.00%
2020 2.50% 1983 48.00%
2019 3.50% 1982 51.00%
2018 4.75% 1981 54.00%
2017 6.00% 1980 56.75%
2016 7.25% 1979 57.25%
2015 8.50% 1978 57.50%
2014 10.00% 1977 58.00%
2013 11.25% 1976 58.25%
2012 12.75% 1975 58.50%
2011 14.25% 1974 58.50%
2010 15.75% 1973 58.75%
2009 17.25% 1972 59.00%
2008 18.75% 1971 59.00%
2007 20.25% 1970 59.25%
2006 21.75% 1969 59.25%
2005 23.25% 1968 60.00%
2004 24.50% 1967 60.00%
2003 26.00% 1966 60.00%
2002 27.50% 1965 60.00%
2001 28.75% 1964 60.00%
2000 30.00% 1963 60.00%
1999 31.25% 1962 60.00%
1998 32.50% 1961 60.00%
1997 33.75% 1960 60.00%
1996 35.00% 1959 57.50%
1995 36.00% 1958 55.00%
1994 37.00% 1957 55.00%
1993 38.00% 1956 55.00%
1992 39.00% 1955 55%
1991 40.00% 1954 55%
1990 40.75% 1953 and earlier 55%
1989 41.50% Ìý Ìý
1988 42.25% Ìý Ìý
1987 43.00% Ìý Ìý

Appendix G

Land Values

The value of the developed land shall be taken to be the following percentages of the aggregate of the ARC of all buildings and external works. Central London North & South are to be valued on their site area direct to £/ha:

REGION % ADDITION
South East 16.75
East Midlands 9.25
East 14.00
North East 4.50
North West 11.00
South West 15.25
West Midlands 14.25
Yorkshire & Humberside 11.50
Central London North Bespoke approach — please seek advice from the NVU Class Lead
Central London South Bespoke approach — please seek advice from the NVU Class Lead
Greater London NW 70.00
Greater London SW 47.00
Greater London NE 43.75
Greater London SE 43.25
Cardiff 14.00
Mid & North Wales 4.00
South Wales 5.75

Practice note 2017

1. Market appraisal

Ambulance Trusts continue to review their estate requirements to match modern demand profiles.

It is recognised that older sites are generally more expensive to maintain and that costs can be reduced if trusts consolidate and modernise their estates by fully implementing a hub and spoke estates model with make ready operational system. Co-location with the other blue light services or local authorities is also common with site sharing is also seen as having particular cost advantages in rural areas.

Examples of shared service facilities and standalone ambulance stations can be readily identified by searching the internet.

2. Changes from the previous practice note

Ambulance Stations are a sui generis class for rating purposes and as previously the choice of valuation method should be determined having established the facts on the ground. Where useful rental evidence exists on the subject property or within the class a rentals approach should be adopted. Alternatively, where it can be established that there is a relationship between rents paid for ambulance stations and other more generic classes (such as garages, workshops or industrial property) then that relationship can be used to value stations in adjoining areas where no direct evidence exists. However this approach should not be applied too far geographically from the source of the evidential base.

When using the contractor’s basis as the preferred method of valuation, the following changes have been made.

  • The costs to be applied at Stage 1 of the contractor’s basis relate to the modern substitute and do not relate to the cost of replacing the actual building as was the approach adopted for the 2010 List.

  • A revised Stage 1 costs based on two size bands applicable to ambulance stations of all types have been adopted.

  • The age and obsolescence allowances applied at Stage 2 now reflect all of the attributes and disadvantages of the actual buildings in comparison with the modern substitute and has been revised in line with other civic classes.

  • External works additions and land values have also been revised.

3. Ratepayer discussions

A Group Pre-Challenge Review (GPCR) has been completed for the 2017 Rating List. The GPCR comprised of a consortium of agents including Gerald Eve, Avison Young and Deloitte Real Estate. The agreed scheme relates to those ambulance stations valued on the contractor’s basis with all aspect of the scheme agreed with the exception of developed land values for Central London North and Central London South.

4. Valuation scheme

Ambulance Stations are a sui generis class for rating purposes and as such will mainly be valued on the contractor’s basis. That said, where sufficient rental evidence exists within the class and geographic locality a rentals approach should be adopted. This is unlikely to be the case with purpose-built stations however more likely where vacant and to let the whole hereditament is akin to a garage/workshop/industrial property.

In circumstances where the contractor’s basis of valuation is deemed appropriate, it is to be applied in accordance with the Valuation Office Rating Manual Section 4: Part 3: The Contractor’s Basis of Valuation, using the guidance below in relation to each stage of the valuation process.

The costs shown in this section are for ease of reference. In all cases where a cost guide code is shown it is this that which must be input into the NBS template, not the costs shown here. Where the cost guide code shows options, the costs shown in this practice note should be used to aid selection. Should the cost guide show different costs to those shown in a current version of this practice note, please refer to the CCT.

The costs stated in Appendix A apply to standalone ambulance stations. When assessing those ambulance stations where sites and facilities are shared with other blue light or local authority occupiers advice should be sought from the CCT who will liaise with the appropriate specialist within the National Valuation Unit if necessary.

4.1 Stage 1 — Estimated Replacement Cost

Building Costs

With the exception of areas that are not used at the AVD and have no prospect of being used, the actual GIA of the station should be used to calculate the Estimated Replacement Cost (Stage 1) of the hereditament in accordance with Appendix A. Guidance in relation to the treatment of superfluity is given in the Rating Manual section relating to ambulance stations.

External Works

The cost of external works is to be added in accordance with Appendix B.

Location Factors

Location factors should be applied in accordance with the Valuation Office Cost Guide 2017 and shown at Appendix C.

Contract Size Adjustment

An adjustment for contract size is to be made to the building cost in accordance with the 2017 Valuation Office Cost Guide and replicated in Appendix D below.

Professional Fees and Charges

Professional fees and charges are to be added for in accordance with the guidance given in the 2017 Cost Guide and shown at Appendix E.

4.2 Stage 2 — Age and Obsolescence

The ERC established at Stage 1 above is converted to ARC by applying an age and obsolescence allowance.

The standard age and obsolescence allowances (non-industrial) to be applied to the ERC of the individual blocks of permanent buildings are set out inÌýRating Manual: section 4 part 3 — the Contractor’s basis of valuation. Adjustments for age and obsolescence should be made in accordance with Appendix F.

The scales contained in Appendix F take into account the following salient points:

a. The age and obsolescence scales set out in the rating manual have been agreed to represent the combined age-related physical depreciation along with functional obsolescence and technological redundancy exhibited by buildings of each age typical for their quality, specification and condition. It is anticipated that the stated allowances will be adopted in the majority of cases and only either moderated or increased in exceptional circumstances.

b. Extensions are to be given an allowance appropriate to their age unless of a lower specification than would be expected of a building of that age in which case the allowance should be increased to a level appropriate to reflect the specification of the building as a whole.

c. In respect of physical depreciation, the above scales are intended to reflect normal wear and tear and/or deterioration due to the age of the building. The scales assume an average degree of cyclical refurbishment work will have been undertaken, to include whole or partial renewal of building sub-components, most particularly relating to mechanical and electrical services and internal fit-out, but also including periodic renewal of roof coverings and windows.

d. It follows from the above that no adjustment away from the scales is required in the majority of cases where older buildings have been subject to modernisation and refurbishment works, as these are explicitly assumed to have occurred. An exception to this would be for a building taken back to shell and reconstructed with significant renewal of structural elements, where an abatement of age-related physical obsolescence may be required.

e. An example of a building requiring an abatement of the allowances provided by the scales (due to the mitigation of physical depreciation) would be where a major renovation has occurred utilising the original building foundations, frame (including upper floors) but with comprehensive replacement of the external envelope (walls, windows), a complete internal refit and wholescale replacement of mechanical and electrical services.

f.ÌýConversely, the above scales will be insufficient to reflect physical obsolescence in cases where buildings are substantially un-modernised and in any case, the scales do not apply in instances where theÌýhereditamentÌýis not repairable at reasonable cost and where it falls to be valued rebus sic stantibus.

g. To qualify as a substantially un-modernised building it is expected that the building will predominantly have the following:

  • single glazed windows

  • original internal layout

  • original ceiling height, with no suspended ceilings

  • original external walls

  • pre 1980 internal finishes (flooring, ceiling and walls, internal doors and fixtures and fittings) This is not intended to be applicable to prestige buildings that add character and esteem to theÌýhereditament.

h. In respect of functional and technological obsolescence, for buildings that remain in operational use, the scales include adjustments to reflect functional and technological deficiencies observable in buildings typical of their original period of construction but taking account of the level of assumed cyclical refurbishment reflected in the physical depreciation element of the scales.

i. The type of functional and technological obsolescence factors already reflected in the scales include the following:

  • poor energy efficiency and/or environmental sustainability

  • inappropriate layout inhibiting flexible and efficient space utilization

  • modern health and safety, fire or building regulations that preclude or limit the original purposes of the building

  • dated design practices that restrict modern usage (such as lack of, or minimal, floor and ceiling voids)

  • the absence of modern space heating or air conditioning systems within a building

j.ÌýIt follows that only where buildings display specific functional deficiencies or issues of technological redundancy, that are atypical for their age, the age-related allowances provided by the scales should be increased.

k. One indicator that additional functional obsolescence is present such that the allowance provided by the scales should be adjusted is the presence of new and/or replacement facilities making the existing building surplus. Such replacement or other material redundancy should be considered and may result in the total redundancy of the pre-existing building, such as 100% obsolescence.

l.ÌýIf at theÌýAntecedent Valuation Date, where there are buildings, or parts of buildings, that through an established pattern of use have been unused for a number of years the area of these buildings, or parts of buildings, is to be excluded from the GIA.

m. This adjustment takes into account deficiencies in the actual building from an occupational point of view, which is not reflected in the ERC.

4.2.1 Flat Roof Allowance

Permanent buildings with a flat roof are to receive an additional line entry allowance. The allowance is not to be applied to temporary buildings, stores, workshops or garages.

    • £80 per m2 ARC of the footprint of the flat roof for buildings constructed up to and including 2004.
    • £60 per m2 ARC of the footprint of the flat roof for buildings constructed after 2004.
  1. Where a building has varying roof types a reasonable apportionment should be made to arrive at the allowance.
  2. What is flat as opposed to a pitched roof will generally be self-evident. Flat roofing allowances will automatically apply here to all types of flat roof. In instances where an allowance is sought for pitched roofing caseworkers should seek advice from the National Valuation Unit before proceeding.

4.3 Stage 3 — Land Value

The value of the developed land should be added in accordance with Appendix G below.

Developed land is defined as land consisting of the footprint of all buildings, associated landscaped areas, roadways, car parks, hard standings and paths. Any additional land on

the site will be viewed as undeveloped land and valued as amenity land for the appropriate region as detailed in the 2017 Land Value Practice Note.

4.4 Stage 4 — De-capitalisation Rate

The effective capital value (ECV) of the hereditament shall be de-capitalised to an annual equivalent by taking the prescribed (higher) rate.

4.5 Stage 5 — End Adjustments

Any advantage or disadvantage which might affect the value of the occupation of the hereditament as a whole should be reflected at this last stage. An adjustment under this head should not duplicate adjustments made elsewhere and most buildings will not warrant further allowances at this stage.

Appendix A

Building Costs

Ambulance stations
Size (m²) Cost Guide Reference £/³¾2
&±ô³Ù;1,000³¾Â² 60F00B £1,250
≥1,000³¾Â² 60F00E £1,350

Appendix B

The Addition for External Works

Typical external works comprise the following:

  • paths, paving, vehicle parking areas, access roads, boundary fences, gates, lighting, landscaping

  • foul and surface water manholes, pipes and connections

  • incoming mains electric, gas, water and telephone services

Building ratio/description External works addition
1 Town centre or island site typically with 90% or greater building ratio, no more than a small yard or garden area, no external ambulance or car parking. 5%
2 As 1 above, but typically with an 80% to 90% building ratio, very limited parking, external lighting, landscaping and some boundary fencing. 10%
3 Site typically with 50%/75% building ratio, some landscaping around buildings, secure boundary fencing, ambulance parking with limited general parking, external lighting and landscaping 17.5%
4 As 3 above, but typically with 35%/50% building ratio, landscaping around buildings, secure boundary fencing, external lighting, general parking within the hereditament which falls short of full requirements. 25%
5 Site typically with about 25%/35% building ratio, landscaping around buildings, secure boundary fencing, external lighting and adequate general parking within the hereditament for all staff and other users. 30%

Notes

  1. The plot ratio is the building GIA expressed as a percentage of the total site area (including building footprint).

  2. An appropriate percentage addition should be chosen from the above ranges to reflect the extent of external works within the hereditament using plot ratio as an indicative guide only.

Appendix C

Location Adjustment

N.B. The Regions referred to are administrative areas and are not significant boundaries.

NORTH EAST REGION NORTH WEST REGION
Durham County 0.98 Ìý Cheshire 0.91
Northumberland 1.02 Ìý Greater Manchester 0.91
Tees Valley 1.01 Ìý Lancashire 0.91
Tyne & Wear 0.98 Ìý Merseyside 0.91
Ìý Ìý Ìý Cumbria 0.91
Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý
YORKSHIRE & HUMBERSIDE REGION Ìý Ìý SOUTH WESTERN REGION Ìý
East Riding and North Lincolnshire 0.91 Ìý Cornwall 1.03
North Yorkshire 0.97 Ìý Devon 1.01
South Yorkshire 0.93 Ìý Dorset 1.03
West Yorkshire 0.91 Ìý Gloucestershire 1.02
Ìý Ìý Ìý North Somerset 1.01
Ìý Ìý Ìý Somerset 1.00
Ìý Ìý Ìý Wiltshire 1.02
Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý
EAST MIDLANDS REGION Ìý Ìý WEST MIDLANDS REGION Ìý
Derbyshire 1.06 Ìý Herefordshire 0.91
Leicestershire and Rutland 1.04 Ìý Shropshire 0.93
Lincolnshire 1.05 Ìý Staffordshire 0.92
Northamptonshire 1.10 Ìý Warwickshire 0.96
Nottinghamshire 1.04 Ìý West Midlands 0.94
Ìý Ìý Ìý Worcestershire 0.96
Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý
EAST OF ENGLAND REGION Ìý Ìý SOUTH EAST REGION (EXCLUDING LONDON) Ìý
Bedfordshire 1.03 Ìý Berkshire 1.12
Cambridgeshire 0.99 Ìý Buckinghamshire 1.11
Essex 1.04 Ìý East Sussex 1.14
Hertfordshire 1.07 Ìý Hampshire 1.09
Norfolk 0.96 Ìý Isle of Wight 1.08
Suffolk 0.98 Ìý Kent 1.13
Ìý Ìý Ìý Oxfordshire 1.08
Ìý Ìý Ìý Surrey 1.17
Ìý Ìý Ìý West Sussex 1.12
WALES CENTRAL LONDON SOUTH
North Wales Ìý Ìý Lambeth 1.17
Flintshire 0.90 Ìý Southwark 1.17
Conwy 0.94 Ìý Wandsworth 1.19
Denbighshire 0.91 Ìý Ìý Ìý
Gwynedd 0.98 Ìý GREATER LONDON NORTH EAST Ìý
Isle of Anglesey 0.96 Ìý Hackney 1.15
Wrexham 0.93 Ìý Haringey 1.18
Ìý Ìý Ìý Newham 1.08
Mid Wales Ìý Ìý Tower Hamlets 1.15
Carmarthenshire 0.98 Ìý Barking and Dagenham 1.06
Ceredigion 1.01 Ìý Enfield 1.08
Powys 0.99 Ìý Havering 0.98
Pembrokeshire 0.93 Ìý Redbridge 1.05
Ìý Ìý Ìý Waltham Forest 1.07
Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý
South Wales Ìý Ìý GREATER LONDON NORTH WEST Ìý
Blaenau Gwent 0.97 Ìý Barnet 1.09
Bridgend 0.95 Ìý Brent 1.11
Caerphilly 0.95 Ìý Ealing 1.16
Cardiff 0.96 Ìý Harrow 1.06
Monmouthshire 1.01 Ìý Hillingdon 1.07
Neath Port Talbot 0.90 Ìý Hounslow 1.06
Newport 0.96 Ìý Ìý Ìý
Rhondda, Cynon, Taff 0.94 Ìý GREATER LONDON SOUTH EAST Ìý
Swansea 0.94 Ìý Bexley 1.12
Torfaen 0.94 Ìý Bromley 1.09
Vale of Glamorgan 0.98 Ìý Croydon 1.12
Ìý Ìý Ìý Greenwich 1.13
CENTRAL LONDON NORTH Ìý Ìý Lewisham 1.10
Camden 1.19 Ìý Ìý Ìý
City of London 1.11 Ìý GREATER LONDON SOUTH WEST Ìý
Hammersmith & Fulham 1.18 Ìý Kingston Upon Thames 1.14
Islington 1.16 Ìý Merton 1.13
Kensington & Chelsea 1.23 Ìý Richmond Upon Thames 1.12
Westminster 1.19 Ìý Sutton 1.10
Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý

Appendix D

Contract Size Adjustment

The adjustment for contract size should be made having regard to the total ERC (after adjustment for location but before the addition for fees) in accordance with the below scales.

ERC £ % Adjustment
Up to 0.25 million + 10% max
0.5 million + 8%
0.75 million +6%
1.0 million +4%
1.5 million +2%
2.0 million +1%
3.0 million ZERO
4.0 million -1%
5.0 million -2%
7.0 million -3%
10.0 million -4%
15.0 million -5%
18.0 million -6%
20.0 million -7%
25.0 million -8%
35.0 million -9%
Over 40.0 million - 10.0% MAX
NB. Intermediate figures may be interpolated. Ìý

Appendix E

The Addition for Fees

Fees should be added at the percentages shown in the Valuation Office published Cost Guide at Section 7. For convenience these are shown below inclusive of the 2% complexity addition. Note that minimum fees may apply to counter inversion.

Size of Contract % Adjustment
Sums up to £750,000 14%
£750,000 to £1,499,000 13%
£1,500,000 to £3,999,999 11.5%
£4,000,000 to £7,499,999 10.5%
£7,500,000 to £14,999,999 9.5%
Over £15,000,000 9%

Appendix F

Civic Buildings Obsolescence Allowances — Ambulance Stations

Year of Building Completion % Age and Obsolescence Allowance Year of Building Completion % Age and Obsolescence Allowance
2017 0.00% 1985 40.00%
2016 0.75% 1984 40.75%
2015 1.50% 1983 44.00%
2014 2.50% 1982 47.25%
2013 3.50% 1981 50.50%
2012 4.75% 1980 53.75%
2011 6.00% 1979 54.50%
2010 7.25% 1978 55.00%
2009 8.50% 1977 55.50%
2008 10.00% 1976 56.00%
2007 11.25% 1975 56.50%
2006 12.75% 1974 56.75%
2005 14.25% 1973 57.25%
2004 15.75% 1972 57.50%
2003 17.25% 1971 58.00%
2002 18.75% 1970 58.25%
2001 20.25% 1969 58.50%
2000 21.75% 1968 58.50%
1999 23.25% 1967 58.75%
1998 24.50% 1966 59.00%
1997 26.00% 1965 59.00%
1996 27.50% 1964 59.25%
1995 28.75% 1963 59.25%
1994 30.00% 1962 60.00%
1993 31.25% 1961 60.00%
1992 32.50% 1960 60.00%
1991 33.75% 1959 57.50%
1990 35.00% 1958 55.00%
1989 36.00% 1957 55.00%
1988 37.00% 1956 55.00%
1987 38.00% 1955 and earlier 55.00%
1986 39.00% Ìý Ìý

Appendix G

Land Values

REGION % ADDITION
South East 15.00
East Midlands 11.25
East 14.00
North East 4.75
North West 11.75
South West 11.25
West Midlands 14.25
Yorkshire & Humberside 10.75
Central London North £36,000,000/³ó²¹
Central London South £13,600,000/³ó²¹
Greater London NW 55.00
Greater London SW 33.00
Greater London NE 34.00
Greater London SE 28.00
Cardiff 13.75
Mid & North Wales 4.50
South Wales 7.00