ǸԹ

Skip to main content
Guidance

Whistleblowing: for prescribed persons

Advice for prescribed persons on how to deal with whistleblowing disclosures.

Applies to England, Scotland and Wales

Overview of whistleblowing

Whistleblowing is when a worker reports wrongdoing in the public interest.

The Employment Rights Act 1996 protects workers in Great Britain who ‘blow the whistle’ from being treated unfairly and fromdismissal, ifcertain conditions in the Act are met. This is known legally as making a ‘protected disclosure’.

For a worker to receive protection, they must:    

  • reasonably believe that a disclosure is “in the public interest”

  • reasonably believe that the disclosure shows that one or more type of wrongdoing listed in the Act has taken place, is taking place or is likely to take place. For example, a danger to health and safety

  • make the disclosure through the appropriate channels. For example, to their employer or to a relevant regulator or organisation, known as a ‘prescribed person

and this guidance only relates to Great Britain.

Workerscan raise concernsat any time about an incident that happened in the past, is happening now, or you believe will happen in the future.

What qualifies as whistleblowing

Toqualify for whistleblowing protection under the law, a worker must:

  • reasonably believe thattheirdisclosureis aboutacertain type ofwrongdoing

  • reasonably believe thatreporting the wrongdoing is“in the public interest”

  • make thereportthrough the appropriate channels

These conditions are explained further below.

Disclosures of wrongdoing that count as whistleblowing

A worker mustreasonably believethatone or more ofthe following types of wrongdoing has taken place, is taking place or is likely to take place:

  • a criminal offence – for example,an employer committing fraud

  • a breach of a legal obligation – for example, an employer does not have the right insurance

  • a miscarriage of justice– for example, a worker hasidentifiedevidence that was not provided to a court that theyreasonably believewould have changed the outcome of a case

  • someone’s health and safetyisin danger – for example, customers have been served contaminated food

  • damage to the environment – for example, new business activities are likely to pollute local rivers

  • sexual harassment – for example, a worker sexually harasses other workers

  • the deliberate concealment of information tending to show any of the above

Public interest test

A worker mustreasonably believethatreporting the wrongdoing is“in the public interest”.

Generally, thismeansthe wrongdoingwillimpactothers, not just the worker. For example, other colleagues or the public.

In deciding if the disclosure is in the public interest aTribunalwould look at the facts of the specific case, butmay considerthe followingfour factors whendeterminingwhether a disclosure is in the public interest:

  1. The numbers in the group whose interest the disclosure served:for example, a larger number of peopleimpactedby wrongdoing might be more likely to be considered in the public interest although not necessarily.
  2. Thenatureof the alleged wrongdoingand theimpact ofthe wrongdoingdisclosed:an assessment of whether the wrongdoing wasmarginalorindirectorimportant. A disclosure affectinga very importantinterest e.g. public health or substantial financial fraud might be more likely to meet the test even if the group affected isrelatively small.
  3. The nature of the wrongdoingdisclosed:If the wrongdoing was deliberateor accidental may betaken into accountand where the wrongdoing was deliberate, this might be more likely to be in the public interest than an inadvertent wrongdoing affecting the same amount of people.
  4. The identity of the alleged wrongdoer:If the wrongdoing involves a high-profile person or large organisation, their actions may have had wider reach and thereforemay bemore likely to be considered in the public interest.

Who workers can make a disclosure to

A worker mustreport the wrongdoing through the appropriate channels for their disclosure to be protected.

They could make their disclosuretotheiremployer or another person they thinkis responsible forthe wrongdoing. A worker for a government department orstatutory bodycan alsomake their disclosure toagovernmentministeror Scottish minister.

A worker can alsomake a disclosure totheir legal adviser,in the course ofobtaining legal advice.

Aworker may want tomake their disclosureexternally toa relevant authority or body.This will be a protected disclosure if it is made toaprescribed person,the workerreasonably believesthat the wrongdoing falls within that person’s prescribedremit, andreasonably believesthat the disclosure (the information and any allegations) issubstantially true.For example, whistleblowing disclosure made to the Financial Conduct Authority about financial crime.

Disclosures to third parties

If a worker makes a disclosure to a third party, such as to a media organisation or by posting on social media, it will only be protected inthe followinglimited circumstances.

A disclosure may be protected if all the following conditions are met:

  • the workerreasonably believesthat the informationdisclosed, and any allegations contained in it, aresubstantially true
  • the worker does not make the disclosure for personal gain
  • it is reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure in the circumstances of the case

Andifoneof the following circumstances applies:

  • theworkerreasonablybelievestheywill besubjected to a detriment(adverse treatment)if they makethe disclosure totheir employerortoa prescribed person

  • where thereisno prescribed personandtheworkerreasonably believesthat evidence will be destroyed or concealed if they make the disclosure to their employer

  • the worker has alreadydisclosedsubstantially thesame information to either their employer or a prescribed person

  • the disclosurerelates to a failure of an ‘exceptionally serious nature’.Whistleblowing legislation does not define ‘exceptionally serious,this would be for an employment tribunal or a court todetermineon a case-by-case basis

Role of a prescribedpersonsin whistleblowing

Prescribed persons aredesignatedby an order made by the Secretary of State and listed in The Public Interest Disclosure (Prescribed Persons) Order 2014.

Read the list of prescribed people.

Aprescribedpersoncan receive whistleblowing disclosures(protected disclosures)from workersabout matters within their remit.

As a prescribed personsyoumayhaveinvestigatory and regulatory functionswhichyoucanactuponwhen relevantinformationhas beendisclosedtoyou.This canincludefurther work beyond theinitialcontact:froma single follow-up call with the whistleblower to seek further clarity,upto a large piece of work investigating the organisation that has been reported.

If the statutory functionsof the organisation permit,youcan encouragetheseorganisationsto have whistleblowing policiesthatassistin ensuring effective procedures arefollowed,makingit more likely that concernsareraised internallyandreducing the chances of escalation.

Mostprescribed persons must publish annual reports on disclosuresreceived,this isrequired under.See ‘Duty to report on whistleblowing disclosures’.

Dz-dzٱ𳦳ٱ徱Dzܰ

Everyprescribed personthat interacts withthe public receives complaints.Not all of these will be whistleblowing disclosures. In considering whether to treat a complaint as a whistleblowing disclosure, you should considerwhat qualifies as whistleblowing.

Ultimately, whethera complaint is a whistleblowing disclosure can only bedeterminedby an employment tribunal.As a general rule, you should treatany concerns about potential wrongdoing seriously and take steps to address them.

Duty to reporton whistleblowing disclosures

Youmust produceand publishan annual report on whistleblowing disclosures made toyouunder theEmployment Rights Act 1996, except ifyou’reexempt (list of exemptions below).

Thisreporting period runs from 1 April to 31 March each year.

The reportmustcontain:

  • thetotalnumber of disclosuresyoureceivedinthe reporting periodand that fall within your remit as a prescribed person(the prescribed person mustreasonably believethe disclosure of information is a qualifying disclosure)

  • the number of disclosures whereyoudecided to take further action in that period (whether,or not,that action wasactually undertakenwithin that period)

  • an explanation ofyourfunctionsandobjectives

  • asummary of the type of action taken

  • asummary of how the informationdisclosedhasimpactedonyour organisation’sability to perform its functions and meet its objectives

For example,ifan objectiveofyourbody is to improve services,it may be possible to say that the disclosures have led to an improvement in services inyoursector (provided doing so would notidentifyanywhistleblowersor the subjectsof the whistleblowing).

What counts as taking further action

You must report on the number of disclosures where you decided to take further action. This could include the number of:

  • disclosures that were referred to an alternative body

  • disclosures thatrequiredfurther investigation

  • disclosures where you made recommendations to employers on how they could rectify the problems you found (either in relation to their whistleblowing policies and procedures, or in relation to the issues which form the substance of the whistleblowing disclosure)

  • organisations investigated that had whistleblowing policies in place

  • enforcement actions taken where you found evidence of wrongdoing

What to include in a summaryof the type of action taken

Your summary of the action taken could includeinformation on:

  • cases where the issue was resolved after first contact with the employer

  • anyfurtherinvestigations and theiroutcomes

  • anyenforcement actionsand their outcomes

Thereport shoulddemonstratethat forevery disclosureyou have received, you have:

  • givenitreasonable consideration

  • dealt withiton a case-by-case basis

  • acted on itto a defined set of policies and procedures, ensuring a consistent approach

Protecting confidentiality

Youmustnot include any case-specific informationin your reportwhich could lead totheidentification of:

  • a whistleblower

  • the employer

  • anyone else involved

Youmustnot include anythingwhich could compromise confidentiality of an ongoing investigation.

When you mustpublish the report

You mustpublish the report:

  • within 6 months of the end of the reporting periodwhichruns for 12 months, from 1 April to 31 March

  • onyour organisation’swebsite(oranywhereelseyouconsiderappropriate forbringing the report to thepublic’sattention)

The report may be included as part of another report which you publish, such as an annual report, or it may be a standalone report.

𳾱پDzԲ

You’reexempt frompublishingtheannual reportifyou’re:

  • an MP

  • a Minster of the Crown

  • a Welsh Minister

  • a Scottish Minister

  • the European Securities and Markets Authority

  • an auditor appointed to audit smaller authorities

Updates to this page

Published 7 April 2026

Sign up for emails or print this page